Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:NIntendo Wii, Opera, www.youtube.com/xl (Score 1) 304

I preordered the Wii disc, and got it the first day. The quality is excellent. Not as good as a EDTV DVD, but damn good, and they correctly send anarmorphic widescreen versions, so I haven't had to screw around with view mode settings. Our Wii is set in widescreen mode and it all Just Works. Our DSL is quite slow (1.5 mbit, tops) and there is absolutely no stuttering or tearing. Much better than using our PC with Silverlight.

The kids are going nuts streaming tons of Scooby Doo (even my 3-year old can pick cartoons to watch), I'm catching up on 30 Rock, the wife is geeking out to Farscape.

Comment Re:Ah, yes, one of the modern evils... (Score 4, Insightful) 533

I agree, since houses in good communities are free and good paying jobs easy to come by, it's really a wonder that everyone doesn't just live 1 minute away from their job. Each time you a change job, all you have to do is simply find a new house you like, kill the person who lives there and steal his deed. Then find a moving company, kidnap their children until they move your stuff there. Unlike the house owner, you have to kidnap the kids instead of just killing them, because if they're dead they obviously can't move your stuff for you.

Or maybe, just maybe, the economics are different for other people in different places.

Comment Re:Fair Tax (Score 2, Insightful) 613

Yes, LOW. Stop it using these stupid "X% of total tax" things make it look like the wealthy are unfairly taxed. All it does is show that 1% of people have 25% of the total assets. Income inequality is fine, but don't piss on the poor and tell them it's raining. If people pay the same share regardless of their income or assets then it's regressive and hurts people who make less.

This isn't splitting a restaurant bill, where you only consume the portion you pay for.

If you're going camping with your kids, you don't make them carry 1/4th of the total load and break their backs while you whistle Dixie, you give them a load proportional to their ability to carry it. That's because you are sharing a burden together that benefits everyone.

Comment Re:Intuit are evil ... (Score 1) 613

It's not even a technical reason, like a data format change. They openly discontinue Quicken's online services after 3 years, just for Mo Money. Years ago, they changed the protocol from directly downloading from your bank, to proxying through Intuit. And, they keep moving features from Basic into Deluxe. Gone are the days of buying Basic and using it for a few years. Now you have to get the latest and greatest, and oops, now you have upgrade your old computer too! Isn't that nice?

Comment Re:HTML5 for the win? Sorry, that's not a codec. (Score 1) 297

You don't even have to click the freakin' widget! I scroll my screen with the keyboard. As soon as a Flash object scrolls *under* the mouse (which are basically everywhere), it proceeds to eat the keystrokes, and I can scroll no more. It cannot tell the difference between a mouse that moves over the area to decide I am going to interact, it's merely sufficient for something to scroll underneath it. This should be a two-second fix.

So many things do this now, that I have to carefully "park" the mouse over the damn scrollbar in order to scroll normally!

Comment Re:The problem (Score 1) 415

Right on, but it's even worse than that. About a month ago, FB changed all the default privacy settings again. It means most albums are now open to the world, unless you go through and check every single album. I've been able to look through albums of friends-of-friends, even without the tagged-friend loophole.

Have I told anyone yet? Nah. People who post embarrassing photos online should learn the hard way.

Comment Re:Nothing Latent About It (Score 1) 596

Sigh. Either you haven't thought very deeply about human factors, or you're young enough that you've never had to experience any sort of back, neck, or eye pain.

I don't know about you, but when I sit and read a book for a few hours, I don't put it at arm's length on a coffee table or desk. Instead, I sit on the couch and drop it into my lap, resting my it arms. I'll switch positions around (everyone does it unconsciously) to keep from getting stiff in one position. Bring it up close to my eyes for some time, so your eyes focus at different length and don't get so tired. Handing a laptop to your friend sitting next to you, to say "Hey, check this out" is geeky and awkward. And so on.

I'll say it again, a clamshell design is a total fail for this sort of informal use. My old body starts hurting after a short time trying to use a laptop in such a way.

A phone is valuable because it's always on you, but it doesn't make a very good multitasking computer or book reader. A laptop is valuable because it's powerful, stores a lot of energy, and can multitask, but it doesn't make for a very good computer in the living room. There is an unmet need for something like that, something I really didn't notice until I had a laptop and cell phone -- which was only until very recently. For people like my sister, who don't use a land line or desktop, and multitask their computer use with everything else, it's going to be a hit. She _never_ sits at a desk to use her computer, ever. The laptop is there on the couch, 24/7.

If it's fashionable enough, Apple is going to cry all the way to the bank on this.

Comment Re:Nothing Latent About It (Score 2, Interesting) 596

Sure: a netbook you can comfortably use while laying on the couch.

Really. The clamshell design of a laptop or netbook, fine for a desk, makes it difficult to use when laying on a couch, and nearly impossible in bed. Or maybe I'm just getting so old, that my body can't contort to the require viewing and keyboard angle necessary to use the damn thing. I'd almost rather use my phone, despite the tiny keyboard and difficult multitasking.

Comment Re:never can get enough of the theme song. (Score 1) 110

I was bored a few years ago, and transcribed the tune out. I did very little else to it other than picks some sounds that they might have used in the first place. So, it's only a four-voice tune, representative of the hardware of the time. It would be easy to fill out and make it thicker, but part of the charm of the tune that it sounds good, with such a limited sound technology. Enjoy.

Slashdot Top Deals

"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight

Working...