It's the same as posting an image with privacy set to "Everyone" and providing an exception to specific users.
This is possible today.
However, with new privacy settings one has to approve other people's photo tags, so this photo will never show up on taggee's profile.
Only your friends will see it.
How is it different from photoshopping an image and then sending it around from your email address?
The tagged person needs to approve that tag first. Only then his friends would discover the photo via taggee's profile.
The photo would indeed be visible to poster's friends, but he could've mentioned the person's name (without the tag and with whatever custom privacy she chose) to begin with.
"Amazon wants to continue to have an associate program
Do they?
Why write articles when you can take your money and sell NFLX short, generating a fortune, if your prediction is true?
1) Is setting up a helpdesk in another building ethical?
2) Is setting up a helpdesk in another city ethical?
3) Is setting up a helpdesk in another state ethical? Even if they speak in funny language with words like "y'all"?
In what way has Goldman misled investors?
People who were eligible to invest got the report first-hand from GS. People who got it from the leak are still not eligible, interest or no interest.
...should Facebook be valuated...
We should have more financious intellectious discussions like this.
One of the people is always you.
For the second person, would you hide it if you were viewing their profile (without friendship filter)?
It's the most recent photos you were tagged in.
You'd assume they live and work in the same state.
But I guess it's worth commuting hundreds of miles next time you can save 7.25% on Tropic Thunder on BluRay.
Did you bring this up at the last shareholder meeting?
Wouldn't that dilemma be solved with alcohol and cigarettes which are legal and not good for you at the same time?
Remember to say hello to your bank teller.
