This figure reads like it's from the Baghdad Bob School of Economics.

Exactly. Also look at the videos of parents showing and reading aloud from these books at school board meetings; who then are cut off for lewdness in public. That kind of book is being mislabeled as "anatomy".

I was looking for something objective and honest. Josh Sugarman's outfit (VPC) is neither. He openly brags about confusing the public about the "menacing looks" of certain firearms. Look up "VPC" with "menacing looks". The top hit with Google is the claim on vpc.org. Subsequent hits call out VPC on its role in deceiving the public. Do you have anything else?

If you don't like Tiktok, you should be able to articulate why without concealing the fact that it was pornography banned in schools, not books in general.

When criminals are afraid of being caught AND punished. Both must be true. In most places with high crime, police will arrest, but the arrestees are usually not meaningfully prosecuted or their police are so hamstrung that they can't do much arresting.

Most jurisdictions do not register guns. There is no federal registration. How did you determine gun ownership is on a decline? Would you be honest with a stranger who asks about your politically-incorrect valuables? Sales records say gun ownership is up.

Gun and ammunition sales are constantly growing. Gun shops have for the past few years reported more business from first-time gun owners and from demographics who tended not to own guns. Those are solid and verifiable facts. If you can point to something comparable to say gun ownership is down, lay it out here.

Tu quo que much?

That hasn't been true for well over 30 years.

I guess you missed the discussions among drivers that make it quite clear that lower-income people tend to tip much better than do wealthier people. Of course, people with trainwreck or entitled personalities won't tip no matter their wealth. This has been well-known for decades.

The executive branches of governments in the US are not allowed to make law. That's for legislatures alone. It's very antithetical to the basic concept of democracy.

This reads an awful lot like the various homicidal (and genocidal) dictators and wannabes over the years who promise paradise if the people would just cheerfully obey their diktats immediately and without question.

Finally someone else on Slashdot understands long period cycles! It's disgusting that one the most reliable means of BSing people is to look at a tiny slice of a periodic function and go ZOMG!!!!! IT'S GOING UP (or down) FOREVER!!!!

You're a member of the unorganized militia whether you like it or not.

Wrong meaning of "regulate"

That's implied. The right to keep and bear is meaningless otherwise. SCOTUS is rather clear on the rights to things required to get arms.