Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment A puff piece that's outright misleading (Score 2) 66

The article is very light on any detail at all... but it implies - in several places - that this Bitcoin mining company is building generating capacity where none existed before. However the Olkaria Geothermal station at Hell's Gate was set up in 1981, and has had multiple expansions since then - none of which were apparently funded by Gridless (they aren't even mentioned in the Wikipedia article - as of this moment). And does anyone believe Iceland needs Gridless' "help" to develop geothermal energy?

It seems to boil down to the old, specious argument that Bitcoin miners have tried to shill in the past: "we create demand, which encourages the build-out of extra capacity - some of which may serve other non-Bitcoin uses".

But basically Gridless is a leech, like every other Bitcoin-mining outfit. They're just claiming they're less of a leech than most other Bitcoin miners. Why the vapid "reporter" didn't ask the obvious question is beyond me - "So as the non-Bitcoin electrical demands at these sites grows, do you plan to permanently shut off those mining rigs?"

Comment Re:Maybe It's Documentation On Location. (Score 3, Insightful) 90

Or, perhaps, the documentation is fine but someone simply made a mistake.

Or there are just too many things crammed into a small space at that location, and the light pole installers knew going in it was gonna be a dicey job to begin with.

Sometimes things just happen.

Comment Re:Welcome to the machine (Score 1) 259

I've heard a philosopher say somewhere that one of the great paradoxes of American society is that we demand liberty in the public sphere, but we demand authoritarian control in the workplace. No kings, no lords, but your boss deserves your submission.

Unfortunately what I see here in America is - people demand liberty in their own public sphere, but authoritarian control over that of others. At least for those who gravitate towards either end of the political spectrum.

Comment Re:Not with my money. Canceled those clowns. (Score 1) 35

And even Asimov's foundation is actually better without books 4 and 5, nevermind the Benford books,

Oh, those gosh-awful books by the "Killer B's". Actually the Greg Bear book was decent, in large part because he actually made the effort to honor and conform to Asimov's existing universe and style - unlike Brin and Benford, who were seemingly unable to get out of the way of their own inflated egos.

I've said it here before, but I think the best non-Asimov "Foundation" book is Donald Kingsbury's Psychohistorical Crisis. Just be warned its a dense, long book that takes a while to get going.

Slashdot Top Deals

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...