Ascribing ulterior motives? May be, that's because they're playing hard ball and asking for an immediate import ban just before Christmas.

I'm fairly certain he was hosting the content himself. If I spent all my money to make an expensive show and then someone ripped it off and started streaming it for free and stealing my viewers and making money off my work that they paid nothing for, I'd fucking kill them. The fact that Hollywood companies are rich, greedy assholes is irrelevant. Stealing content is stealing content and making money on someone else's work is wrong. If someone ripped off Libre Office and started selling copies for cash and violating the GPL, everyone on slashdot would be going apeshit over it. There is no difference.

Maybe a few 'shots'? <badumching>

or if you think that the only part of a Linux-based system that should be called "Linux" is the kernel

Linux sucks because there's no unified vision of how things are supposed to work (both in UIs and APIs).

Because they are actively selling goods they must know to be unfit for purpose. What if a retailer sold you something they said was wine when it was simply water? Would you not think that was an issue even if they did it thousands of times and refused to stop when the problem was pointed out to them?

Thanks for proving the point. The stupidity is from their customers.

A bad movie is bad, anything else is marketing bullshit.

None. Everyone knows that Republicans can't read.

Bullshit. They read the bible, which is how they know the Earth is only 3,000 years old and Jesus buried the phony dinosaur bones that we dig up.