Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Something wrong here (Score 1) 265

The idea that there is any legitimate reason why the US has to spend more money on its military than all other countries in the world **COMBINED** is absurd. Effective tools my ass.

The money spent by the DoD buys a lot more than you suggest. The US - for example - put a lot of effort into defending Japan in the Cold War so the Japanese did not have to. Japan spent more on 'stuff', we got Hello Kitty and the Prius in return.

I agree with your conclusion: time to let the rest of the world fend for itself. Now, if this gets the Japanese back into an acquisitive mood, or the Germans get feisty and look to Russia ... well hard cheese for their neighbors, I guess.

Comment Re:Something wrong here (Score 1) 265

Um, where does right enter into this?

Good point. I don't know.

the only people who fight back would simply rather die than be dictated to.

Not true: look up the theory of 3g and 4g conflict. Briefly: no army in the world can stand up to a US Armored Brigade. So they don't even try: the conflict shifts from tanks and airplanes to economic warfare, unconventional warfare .... anything but where the US Army is current good at.

Comment Re:Something wrong here (Score 1) 265

Am I alone in feeling disturbed at the trend to separate the combatants by ever increasing distances?

Giving soldiers effective tools makes war less likely, not more likely.

The idea is that if you're armed forces can mow the opposition down like wheat before a threshing machine, the opposition won't even try it.

Look: war is going to happen. Would you be more afraid of a mob of guys with sticks, or an army than can take you out before you know they're there?

Comment Re:This is kind of stupid/obvious (Score 1) 638

I propose that the best time to use Something Else is before it gets there

Well, duh. My other computers run Linux, BSD, etc.

But I guess if you want to fund Apple's push towards the walled garden, that's your business.

It's a fair trade: in return for some cash, I get a computer that mostly gets out of my way and lets me work. What they do with it ain't none of mine.

Comment Wrong Answer (Score 1) 231

because locals don't have the ability to build or buy equipment.

These people don't need open source hooraw: they need good government so can own their land, keep the fruits of their labor, and not kill be slaughtered when the generals are feeling impetuous.

Comment Re:Wait what? Bonuses depending on results? (Score 1) 167

As far as I can tell, this is tying the bonuses of everyone at Google to the efforts of the few people at Google involved in social media crap

Isn't this the way it works for most people?

I work in IT in manufacturing. Our bonus monies are tied to how well the company does, which in turn depends on a whole lot of things, all of them out of my control: marketing, the economy, the bond market and, ultimately, how well the guys in manufacturing are slapping together widgets today.

Comment Re:So uh (Score 1) 964

I am big fan of COAL, because we have lots of it!

You are invited to live downwind from a coal plant. As a bonus, your house is on a railroad carrying coal to the plant - enjoy those long strings of cars grinding by on a daily basis.

Check your dosimeter daily for extra fun and grins.

Comment Re:Up the gas tax five dollars for passenger vehic (Score 1) 603

Up the gas tax five dollars for passenger vehicles

Horrible idea.

You can't enforce it a tax on 'passenger vehicles'.
Many of us have habits and jobs that don't go match with driving an electric vehicle.
Make many other things more expensive for people who can't afford it.

It's really a nifty way to make the bourgeoisie feel like they are doing something good at the expense of the poor.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...