My car has feelings and I love him. I also love my PC that has a nice linux soul and my microwave opven and my bicycle. They should all have rights! Right to be used for spare parts ionce I'm done with them!

I see machines made by this company http://www.motoshot.com/ going to court. They are "Target shooting robots"

The foreskin is product of evolution, if someone dies as consequence of having it, we can certainly deduce that it is a weak specimen of the human race that under normal circumstances should have not been able to reach age of reproduction. Removing that kind of “risk” only allows for the perpetuation of “inferior” specimens and it is therefore detrimental to mankind.

http://knoppix.net/

There is one and people are being tortured and held there with no charge for years

Didn't Obama say that would close the concentration camp in Guantanamo Bay?

I use open source. It has a much smaller number of bugs than propietary software and when they are found, they are fixed much faster.

If you are paying for goods or service, that price should include some form of warranty. I find rather pathetic that it costs lots of money to get an office suite from some suppliers when there is several superior packages avalable for free.

We use a decimal system because wwe have ten fingers (Allegedly). Would a robot fitted with that hand default to octal?

So, if a hardware manufacturer produces a device so that does not work well with third party operating systems, you are placing the blame on the third party operating system rather than the hardware manufacturer? That seems to be an unreasonably biased point of view.

I guess they have exacly the same rights they were excercising when they help the US invade Iraq with no logal reasons nor UN mandate. WE HAVE BIGGER GUNS.

I thought he already did. Isn’t is called MS Windows?

I have enough with bad drivers, I don't want an incompetent pilot flying over my house

To whoever posted this note, thanks. That moderation reflects the fact that moderators are just people that have been given the privilege of moderating based on their status. Their status is based on the opinions of other moderators, which in turn had their moderator privilege granted based on the same status. The privilege of moderation is therefore just a vicious circle where majority rules, wether majority could be either right or wrong, but more often than not, due to lack of actual knowledge wrong. If this were an academic organization, moderation would actually be based in knowledge and an analytical point of view rather than just emotions. I can just assume that this moderator thinks highly of an organization that is nothing more than a high tech gossip enabler. Also, I bet I’ll be moderated -10 for this.