I grew up in Concord, MA and would have loved to ban tourists in the fall. People out leaf-peeping in the fall near Old North Bridge... sometimes in the street with their cameras to get just the right angle.
As much as it would be fun to ban 'things I don't approve of' there are some real safety hazards. Texters on sidewalks often end up in crosswalks and expect cars to be looking because they can't be bothered (yes, pedestrians have the right of way... except when there's a walk light that they didn't check). Sometimes they're at the top of the escalator causing a pile up on said escalator.
There are also common courtesy items that go out the door more and more as people get more self absorbed in their devices. People stopping randomly to check their texts in the middle of a busy sidewalk, during rush hour, rather than taking just a moment to make sure they aren't going to cause a sudden pile up of people who thought said person was going to continue to... walk forward. It really doesn't take long to just do a quick check on the flow of traffic and make sure you're clear before doing something unpredictable.
I agree that we're becoming less violent, but the news is becoming more sensationalist and therefore people think we're becoming more violent.
This comes up a lot around the fact that it's frowned upon to let your 10 year old child walk somewhere alone in many places, even though child kidnappings are way down from the 80's when 10 year olds walking around by themselves was perfectly normal.
Cyclists don't ride on the interstate because it's not allowed, but they would be plenty safe there. Interstates have wide lanes and decent shoulders, and there aren't distractions like driveways, side streets, and unnecessary signage. That other roads weren't designed to accomodate motor vehicles and cyclists is a failure of policy. Legally, cyclists have a right to be there, as does a guy with a horse and buggy or someone driving a backhoe or tractor. And if everyone involved exercises some responsibility and due care, the road can be shared just fine by everyone.
In the U.S. you are required to go a minimum speed on most highways (baring traffic). Even if bikers and horse and buggies were allowed on, they wouldn't be able to get to and maintain the minimum speed limits.
Note to
Tin foil pants? Try getting that through airport security.
This depends on what your games play out like and what aspects you personally like, of course. But for me, I like the aspect of participating in and helping tell a story, so that's how I explain it. That it's a cooperative story-telling adventure.
The other part that often comes up is that since you're helping tell the story, you don't run into plot events that you fundamentally disagree with which ends up making a more compelling story to me. (For instance, "You know how in Story X the main character lets NPC Y die? If that were a table top, you could decide whether or not you thought the main character would have done that)
As I understood the article: The big piece in the article that makes me skeptical is they that tested their mice antibiotic group while still on the antibiotics. That means that the mice had a weight change while on antibiotics, but it did not show whether that continued in the long term after the antibiotics were removed. That's the part that would matter since humans don't take antibiotics every day.
The part that looked at human data was tenuous at best and had a much smaller margin of weight increase than the lab mice did.
THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE