Try reading up on the Cambridge Analytica scandal, for starters. Interfering with who becomes US president - not a problem?
That depends on if you agree with the values of the chosen president now doesn't it.
Isn't that like saying it's ok to help someone rob a bank if I think he deserves the money?
How about FaceBook following your activity around the Internet even while you're logged off?
Frankly making a company based on privacy and advertisement IMO says nothing about a person other than he/she knows how to make money of an idea.
Based on your above two statements, seems like an 'ends justify the means' kind of person.
There's more if you're willing to look for it. Ok, your turn. Minimize, deflect, and explain it all away for me.
Forget my turn. I don't know the guy personally, and that is kind of the point. It seems like all you know about the man is what you read in the latest outrage rag, you have no idea what "values" Zuckerberg possesses. Now let's talk about your values, the values of a judgmental bastard who thinks they understand someone's values based on a few news stories.
I don't know the guy personally, either, but I think you're confusing my negative comments with "mere speculation". Should I not believe that there was a hearing regarding Cambridge Analytica for just cause, and that Zuckerberg responded that he needs to "do better" to help go along with this lie? What if the universe is just a big simulation and none of this matters? Maybe we're all dreaming, hooked up to machines to make someone richer (heh, who knows). I'm dealing with the reality I am presented with, and that includes making my choices about what to believe despite not seeing the facts myself. There is literally nothing more I can do aside from implanting a listening device on Zuck.
And by the way, judging me as a "judgemental bastard" based on a couple of web comments is super hypocritical.