Adding noise to the dark web helps how? You are not going to be a trusted seller just another rando trying to prove themselves. That means needing working samples to establish some trust. It's not the 80's - 90's where people were just dumping the data in dark corners for bragging rights money is changing hands.

Would have to be trivial to distinguish otherwise the system would be impossible to use.

The fake patients would have to have appointments etc, You would have to prevent them from showing up in scheduling, so somewhere there would be a flag or something to differentiate.

Don't worry they are happy to charge you a pile of cash for fairly cheap cameras.

ITBC's tend to be awful, like most anything in the auto industry they would be better off getting out of the way and letting 3rd parties have better integration access, except they would not make them more money.

Regulation kept making cars suck, trucks were exempt.

Thus the point of reminding them that their moderation needs to be limited to legal requirements rather than their whims. The CDA gives them two options, they want to moderate when they care to and keep the blanket protections given because it was viewed as impossible to moderate the internet.

That is their right but it needs to negate their protections from being sued related to the content on their service. Now they want to moderate to appease the cancel culture crowd but want to keep their protections it's one or the other.

because the SSID is from those and they are fleecing people it relates?

Walking them though signing into wifi is painful enough. Lost/damaged power bricks are a constant issue.

Have to say a local cable company was great, they let us (small private school) register the mac address of all our chromebooks to auto login to their SSID.

Were mid pandemic a lot of renters are not paying the landlords at all because there is no recourse presently. Lots of government giving no legal recouse currently and no help with paying their bills but still requiring them to pay out.

More than that it's commercial real-estate at that point. So potentially the middle man company was on the hook for the maintenance and taxes.

That sure worked well for elevator operators.

Study's of how it worked in the past with a very different set of rules is not predictive science. As to over engineering voting, realy?

Any concern related to voting is significant, if the cost of correcting it is minimal there is no reason to not implement it.

Did a 20k simultaneous user system for a decade with 3 prod outages, they moved it to AWS 3 prod outages this year.

The studies look at the past. We have parties that are motivated and unethical looking to abuse the system.

It's not starting with the conclusion it's good engineering you look at potential failure modes and design to prevent them. Mail in voting is potentially fine, but you have to build the systems around it correctly to prevent potential abuses. As previously generaly used it was narrowly applied often to people in a position to avoid abuse and thats what the studies were looking at.

Did not say why they would, seems simply enough for interested parties to provide financial incentives for said crack dealers.

Retirement homes one person could do it all just need whoever does the mail to filter them out.

Point is mail in becomes a verifiable method to buy votes.