Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:makes sense (Score 1) 57

Acidification: So you're saying that the Archaean ocean ph of 6.5-7.0 - you know, when life more or less evolved - is now awful?
https://www.science.org/doi/10...

Dead Zones: https://www.sciencealert.com/d...
"...In a new study, researchers discovered that dead zones have actually been a recurring feature of the Pacific Ocean for longer than anybody ever realized â" at least around 1.2 million years, in fact.

Analyzing a core of ancient sediment drilled from the Bering Sea seabed in the North Pacific, scientists identified 27 separate instances of dead zones â" officially termed oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) â" in the last 1.2 million years, suggesting repeat bouts of hypoxia were a relatively regular feature of the Pacific throughout the Pleistocene...."

Panic more, snowflake.

Comment makes sense (Score -1, Troll) 57

One of the oldest, most durable archaeolifeforms on this planet is threatened by it getting warmer by a couple of degrees?

More likely, some opportunist corals which had highly specialized over the last 20k years or so are unable to adapt to an ever changing climate and are struggling. That's how life works.
What will happen is they will be replaced by more heat tolerant variants while other stretches of ocean too chilly for corals generally will now become habitable.

Corals as a species have survived numerous extinction events. And it's not "speed of the change" as some events - like the Chicxulub impact - had a vastly larger effect than a few degrees and it happened in a geological instant, not centuries. And corals likely struggled but survived just fine.

Comment at a certain point, caveat empty (Score 4, Insightful) 116

I mean, HP's predatory ink bullshit is long since proved, nobody doing the faintest amount of research wouldn't find it.

This isn't exonerating HPs nonsense, I'd love to see them get their comeuppance.

But seriously: STOP BUYING HP SHIT. Not just printers, ALL OF IT.
Until *consumers* punish them for their choices, why should they change? Do you think a huge corporation feels guilt?

Comment Re:book bans are bad durr (Score 1) 250

âoeAll Boys Arenâ(TM)t Blueâ is a young-adult nonfiction book that details the life of George Johnson growing up as a queer Black man. This is a book with explicit passages about fisting, butt plugs, anal, the spit-or-swallow decision and rape as well as 10yr olds performing sodomy, underage incest, strap-on dildo, and blow jobs.

"Gender Queer" has illustrations of fellating a dildo, as well as the MC getting aroused by illustrations of an adult man touching the penis of a young boy.

"Beyond Magenta" has reference to a six year old boy blowing older boys.

"Flamer" has a bunch of tweens talking about the last person to jizz in a bottle has to drink it all,

"This Book is Gay" gives step by step instructions on how to give a handjob.

Is this OK for kids? Those are graphic sex? This book is gay is, afaik LITERALLY MEANT AS A GRAPHIC GUIDE TO GAY SEX, no?

If parents are forcibly removed from School Board meetings on grounds of indecency, for reading text from books their kids brought home from the school library, that's pretty wrong.

If you say that's ok, you're a kook and/or a pedo.

Comment Re:Well, well, quite a surprise... (Score 1) 199

Would I rather live in a regressive petro state with a medieval patriarchy enforced by law where women are little more than chattel slavery and legally regarded as less than a toddler boy? No. I like women as people equal to me in every respect, thanks. That said, I'm also not really fond of 'corrective' sexism where women are a 'favored victim class' long past the point of equality; it's been pretty solid for years that more girls go to college than boys - have the preferential admissions ceased? No? Why?

That said, I think it's delusional to not recognize that men and women approach things differently. Not better or worse, generally, just differently. In 2024, we've all been deeply programmed to never question some things, so it's anathemic if not outright heretical to point out that women:
- tend to care about the rights and feelings of others as well as their own
- tend to be accomodative
- tend to seek group consensus and approval
- tend to be risk avoiding and stability seeking, ....and the inculcation of these approaches as priorities are not necessarily completely positive for larger issues in our democracy nor (especially) in geopolitics.

It's 2024, I expect that if you've read this far (and depending on your age) you'll be reacting in shock and no small anger to these generalizations but they ARE largely proved.
https://www.andrews.edu/~tidwe...
As a VERY broad assertion, I'd state that those feminine qualities undercut democracy by trading things I value like liberty and choice, for things are are less important like comfort and stability.

Hell, I saw a recent study that testosterone actually leads to positive feelings when rejecting authority.

I think women are generally more easily emotionally manipulated. "Look at all the sad little families just trying to cross the border. Look at all the poor children in Gaza."
(Men were too, for sure, but the effeminization of the electorate has led to the deprecation of patriotism generally, so ironically this has left men LESS easily manipulated by that historically very-strong lever on them. Skinny-jeans wearing soyboys aren't going to take to the streets if someone waves a US flag. Well, maybe to protest against it, lol.)

In the same generalization, men can also be TOO uncaring, TOO disruptive, TOO independent of necessary consensus, of course. I just think we've swung way past any sort of rational center today.

Comment book bans are bad durr (Score 1) 250

Yes, stifling intellectual expression is in principle a bad thing.

Otoh, to suggest that all printed matter is sacrosanct is stupid.

What the screeching here fails to note is that a vast array of the books banned are things like graphic sex manuals being pushed into elementary school libraries for, let's be honest, political or sexual goals, neither of which are admirable.

  No reasonable person believes a kindergartener should learn to read by reading the captions to "a guide to Asian anal hardcore" or "how best to suck a co co".

To be clear, I do NOT believe such things should be banned. I personally think they're valueless, but that's irrelevant.

To suggest however that children should be provided unfettered access to them is ridiculous and if you believe that, you're a kook or a pedo.

Comment right (Score 1) 113

Waves of people invade shops, take things freely, and if anyone interferes, THEY get arrested.
Otherwise, nobody gets arrested, and if they are, they're let go immediately without bail and if they fail to show up for their hearing, well, nobody cares.

Yes, of course, knowing their *faces* is the solution.

Anyway, we all know that this will be discontinued anyway when the pictures turn out to be disproportionally "racist".

Comment Nah (Score 4, Insightful) 56

In my meager experience, most actual work is NOT appropriately delivered or communicated in video - it's far too linear, unsearchable, not amenable to note-taking, monologue, and ultimately relies on presenter charisma, beauty, and professional voice and presentation talent - something that's in vastly shorter supply than most people believe.

I hate to imagine what Tufte's opinion of this would be. Buy them, read them, absorb them: https://www.edwardtufte.com/tu...

Comment Let's be honest, x2 (Score 1) 102

1) the teachers that would be fine with this are probably phoning that shit in anyway; would we REALLY expect such a teacher - when told they can't use AI - to scrupulously follow the instructions and laboriously/ethically go through the papers carefully themselves instead?

2) re point 1, let's maybe revisit that whole 'tenure' bullshit and avoidance of merit pay raises/not-raises for teachers in general as some sacrosanct profession? I know if I hand a chunk of my job to a machine, I need to understand that I'm likely training my replacement.

Comment In short (Score 1) 231

....they're a canary in the coal mine for ALL American manufacturing businesses I'm acquainted with.

I've been in industrial logistics for coming up on 35 years now and this is 100% the example of pretty much every AA or AAA company I've dealt with, including corporate elements of my own firm. Boeing maybe was slightly more aggressive (or the results of their shitty, short term strategies are unfortunately vastly more consequential and obvious).

Would love to see some sort of contract clause for senior management up to c-suite that meant that departing the company doesn't exonerate you from the results of your choices, and that the giant, fat payouts are conditional on, dunno, 10 years exposure to clawback for incompetence or liability.

That'll never happen though, because the ones exposed to it would be the ones who would have to implement it.

Slashdot Top Deals

No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.

Working...