Sounds like a reworking of Jacobson's 2009 cover article in Scientific American, which was *savaged* for it's bizarre economic assumptions, as well as it's jury-rigged opposition to nuclear power. Old (and discredited) news.

Or not, you dimwit.

I've known this since the '68 campaign.

Did you click on the ohm page and read the actual paper? Shocking!

Inflation

Some night, drive around your neighborhood at 9:00 to see if there's any kind of law enforcement speed trap in the area. The radar gun could play havoc with nearby wireless.

Just don't drive around too fast!

. . . microkernel is the way to go!

I think that many, if not all, right-thinking people would agree that the best form of government is a benevolent dictatorship.

The problem is that there seems to be a shortage of benevolent dictators.

"... computing the diagonal of inverse covariance matrices..."

Oh, gotcha. Why didn't you say so in the first place?

No.

. . . and trust me, giving them a device that will tell them when they are stressed is about as useful as taping a stethoscope to their chest so they can check whether their heart is beating.

Day traders are *always* stressed. Always.

You're right, but I can phase your response more succinct way:

Strategy flows from mission. If you think you understand your school's ICT mission, write it down. Stare at it.

If you agree with the mission, read the revised strategy document and see if it supports and advances that mission. If it does, say so.
If it doesn't, say what needs to change so it does.

If you don't agree with the mission, say so, but prepare to be ignored (unless you are a signifigant shareholder at your institution.)

If you don't understand what the mission is, tackle that before you contribute to strategy.

I wonder what the scores are for "The Streets of San Francisco" or "The FBI".

I'm sure that "The Fugitive" is the highest of the bunch!

My girlfriend said "Kiss me where it stinks", so I drove her to Detroit.