It's not some. Ionity's whole network is 350 kW. Fastned is deploying 400 kW chargers. Shell is deploying 400 kW chargers. Repsol did 400 kW chargers four years ago.

Dude, you're not able to keep up with your own position and you can't keep your story straight across a few comments. Your own sources that you cite contradict you. You are very plainly not across the state of EV charging. So don't worry about it.

Not "might" not, they are not. Remember your claim is that "most chargers in Europe, other than Tesla superchargers, charge even slower", which is false. Tesla hasn't fielded chargers that match 350 kW chargers, nevermind 400 kW. And now that you realize you're wrong, you are desperate to integrate the new reality in a way that makes you feel better. Your excuses are boring.

It isn't. The Renault Zoe is a small and cheap EV which supports AC charging at 22 kW. Everything you're premising your theories on is wrong.

DC chargers are expensive because of the grid infrastructure they need. Battery integrated DC chargers are cheap from the infrastructure point of view because you can use existing grid connections without needing to upgrade it, but the units themselves are expensive because you're paying for the battery.

Your figures are old. The latest figures from IEA show Europe ahead of the United States in both EVs per charge point (Europe is lower) and kW per EV (Europe is higher).

No. Plenty of 350 kW chargers exist in Europe (e.g. Ionity) and charging networks are deploying 400 kW chargers.

Tesla's newer chargers achieve a maximum of 250 kW, but there are still many V2 Tesla chargers which are only 150 kW.

The plugs are different. The protocol is the same for DC charging.