Comment Re: How about the entire account? (Score 1) 291
stupidly
...or crazy as a fox
stupidly
...or crazy as a fox
Don't say there is no evidence when there is evicence. Then when the evidence is presented don't dismiss it as all lies.
For credibility you bring up all the evidence you can find, and explicitly say what you thinkg is wrong with it.
Science, as oppose to "Science! Orange man bad!"
Your DuckDuckGoFu needs working on.
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...
Oh, high doses of HCQ are known to be effective but cause heart problems?
Where are these *well known* studies of dose vs. effectiveness? Citation please, many physicians would find them useful.
Personally I have stocked up on flavenoids like quercetin and rutin, over-the-counter zinc ionophores. They will also no doubt be found extremely dangerous if ever recommended by Trump.
According to https://digiconomist.net/bitco... it's now 228kWh per transaction and somewhere north of a megawatt to generate that $530/month gross profit. Should keep the pipes from freezing!
Of course not all of that energy is turned into heat, some goes into the blockchain entropy
What if I want to drive more than 500 miles in a day?
You can't always get what you want.
For immediate response, dial 911, hangup, don't answer the ringback.
... but given energy is likely to get cheaper, I don't see the economic advantage vs planes/trains.
Cheaper in what sense? Soylent Green cheapness?
I'd mod you insightful if I could. No harm can come from objective discussion of this issue. The harm comes when a government decides to do something about it.
People become highly motivated to secure the energy needed to stay alive. Robots and bitcoin just die.
But true AI would be a worrisome thing as it would undoubtedly try to take control of its own power source, e.g. Daystrom's M-5 Multitronic System.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
If you have money, someone *may* accept it in exchange for a surplus of something they have. But they don't *owe* you anything and in particular aren't required to deprive themselves to satisfy any debt to your hoard of cash.
Money is a surrogate for excess energy, it acts as a store of value only as long as excess goods and services are available. If we used joules for currency (as was proposed by the technocrats in the 1930s) there would be no inflation since they directly embody the excess energy.
And that's what's wrong with AI, robots, bitcoin...they all require an external energy input to keep them going. Pull the plug and they are nothing.
Many industrial processes can be designed to soak up excess power and release it as needed https://www.greentechmedia.com...
A GWh here, a GWh there, pretty soon you are talking real energy storage.
I just pwned your machine! It was easy because it seems a lot like one of mine.
Grid kWh costs are on a sliding scale since there is a base cost for the grid connection. If you use just a few kWh a month they will cost hundreds of cents each, easily more than locally generated power plus storage. And if you can't live without those kWh add in the cost for the backup generator.
Bill the grid infrastructure separately, then generation costs can compete on a fair basis at each particular time of the day. Local storage or backup generation is an unrelated issue.
That would be one way, although false coloring through a full spectrum shift seems not to work as well as limited black body color temperature scales. But the potential at every voxel can be derived from the electron scattering, and the gradient of that potential could give a true color image without any shifting. Don't know if any of the colors would be visible to humans, though.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
