But Google is still reading Privacy's emails.

Some places are grandfathered in if they had a .edu domain before the current rules took effect. These are mostly non-US post-secondary schools, like the one you mentioned. If UNB didn't already have one, they would not be eligible for one now.

Occam's Razor. I got $10 that says it's a typo on the part of the article writer. No other articles mention them acquiring the domain, just that they're acquiring MincraftEdu (which is at MinecraftEdu.com).

If you buy all your groceries from Amazon Pantry, the sky will blacken with a swarm of drones, each loaded with a single can of baked beans.

It appears to alter the subject's ability to spell simple words, even when the word is emboldened and all caps.

Sorry, I sent Beatles.Revolution.mp3 to /dev/null

I liked the concept of Voyager, but the implementation was meh at best. Enterprise was sort of the same. Both series went in a different direction than I would have liked to see.

For the same reason they ship in styrofoam. You want something nice and bloaty with no real substance to keep it safe.

They bought Hotmail, rather than developing it from the ground up, so I wouldn't be surprised if that's what they needed to do to avoid a complete rewrite, at least for a while.

" Is every kid in that school carrying a cell phone intending to blow people up? Maybe we should put them all in cuffs until we can sort this mess out."

A lot of teachers would probably like that, actually. Not because they think cell phones are to blow people up, just because kids are so fixated on them instead of class.

Once you factor in the invention of peanut butter, they owe us.

The source of news is not irrelevant. Any source can be biased and can present, twist or omit facts that can greatly change the substance of the news.

Would you prefer "naturally replenishing on a scale that is non-depletable in any practical sense at the present time"? It takes a little longer to say, but maybe it would be more to your liking?

At least with Facebook, you generally knew what non-FB sites would post on your FB, as it would ask for your FB login. Google has the same thing, but the parts of the web that are already Google's don't have that separate login. The big ones would be your search history and YouTube.

So, you're saying that going from Windows 7 to, say, Windows 2000 is not a downgrade, but just a lateral change?

Or going from IE6 to IE11 isn't an upgrade, but just a change?

You really don't see how going from an older version with fewer features to a newer version with more features ins't an upgrade? Or maybe you're just being pedantic about the definition of "upgrade"?