Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Does this seem like... (Score 5, Insightful) 135

On the contrary - this seems like some very clever people are looking into potential ways to mitigate a disaster that your run-of-the-mill "patent it and make trillions" pharmaceutical-industry-leading sociopath might gloss over as unprofitable and so therefor not worth pursuing.

Comment Re:How would he know anyway? (Score 1) 377

Where do you get Basset Hound? My favorite thing about AmiMoJo is that his user name always brings to mind the image of Mojo Jojo from Powerpuff Girls. He and I may not see eye to eye on much of anything, but I always get a kick out of seeing his username and getting that happy little nostalgic brain tickle.

Comment Re:America will be wiping it's ass, that's for sur (Score 1) 105

It may be helpful for people to remember that (traditional tank) water heaters provide a ready source of many gallons of potable water in an emergency. Mine holds a mere 50G, but that's enough to keep my family safely hydrated for a good long while. If it's in a location where you can't extract the content from a faucet in the absence of supply side pressure, they all have a drain fitting near the bottom usually threaded for garden hose connection. I have a hard time justifying stockpiling water bottles with 50 gallons of the stuff just sitting there.

Comment Re:More a commentary on shift times... (Score 1) 160

Back in the 90s traffic on I95 between Richmond and DC was frequently in the 80-90MPH range over in the far left lanes. I always attributed it to diplomats and spooky types headed for Quantico and further North into the swamp. But it made that chunk of 95 go by real quick. These days, and for at least the past decade, once you're within 10 miles of Fredericksburg you're lucky to be above zero MPH. I like to make a game of it. How many minutes (or frequently, hours) can you see the "Potomac Mills" sign? Less than an hour is a win.

Comment Re:Honest in their dishonest (Score 1) 141

"Weaving in your lane" should be perfectly acceptable *within your lane*. Vehicles are entitled to use the full lane they occupy provided no traffic infractions are committed.

Incidentally this is also why bicyclists should not be permitted to ride two or more abreast. Each one is entitled to use of the full lane they occupy, so when riding two or more abreast their lane entitlements conflict. Of course the entitlement of the Spandex Menace outpaces that of the average billionaire's teenage daughter, so I'm sure they have a way to argue that their vehicles are special and above the rules.

Slashdot Top Deals

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...