Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Programming

Expensify CEO On 'Why We Won't Hire .NET Developers' 758

TheGrapeApe writes "The CEO of San Francisco-based, VC-backed startup Expensify wrote a post on the company's blog about why he considers .NET experience on a resume a general liability, saying that it will 'definitely raise questions' when screening for developers in his shop. Quoting: '.NET is a dandy language. It's modern, it's fancy, it's got all the bells and whistles. And if you're doing Windows Mobile 7 apps (which the stats suggest you aren't), it's your only choice. But choosing .NET is a choice, and whenever anybody does it, I can't help but ask "why?"' Does he have a point? Or is it counterproductive to screen devs out based on what platforms or languages they have used in the past?"

Submission + - Ths Arizona Governor Sues the US Government (militaryringinfo.com)

Anonymous Coward writes: "The governor of Arizona is fed up with illegals crossing into that state and even more so by the federal governments attempts to get the Enforcement Immigration Law which Arizona has passed nullified.

Arizona is the main corridor for illegals who cross into the US from Mexico and also for dope smugglers. As a result their border with Mexico seems to be out of control. Dope smugglers are fighting a territorial war over this area because it is such a popular route for smuggling drugs and people into the United States.

She in essence is filing a counter suit against the government because of the confrontation with the Arizona law. She is saying by filing the suit that the federal government needs to do more to help secure the Arizona border. They need to have a better plan to assist the State if they are going to interfere in State business. I can agree in principal to this line of reasoning. If the federal government is going to restrict the States doing what they have to do to maintain order then they need to offer an alternative.

I say that we can use our military ring customers to help us to control our borders. They can help out here at home just like they do in other countries who don’t even appreciate our presence."

Spam

Submission + - Ask Slashdot 1

cbytes writes: "So I received a spam email today that acts as if I sent a dirty message to someone and the message I'm getting is the reply. I look it up and it is a virus they attached, so no biggie, it's just spam, right? Well the kicker is that the email address it has in the To: column isn't my email address. It lands in my email but it's addressed to a sopris.net address I never had. So how does it say it's to sopris.net, but end up in my inbox??"

Comment is china a school bully or a professional killer? (Score 1) 208

Either China is the next superpower whose superiority is backed by superb cyber offense capability, or one of these days their "victims" are gonna expose their hubris and gonna send them(China) back to IT stone age. Chinese were quick off the blocks as regards information warfare Add to that their military doctrine is about hiding their strength, obscurity et al. So if they are attacking and not bothering to hide, hmmm.. What are they upto?

Comment No (Score 1) 142

Do you really want CORPORATES have that power? Please. These guys don't even have the common sense to break the boom-bust cycles. It's like giving a knife to a child incapable of learning from experience. So Company A attacks Hacker B. Only it turns out that the attack went awry and Hacker B is actually a rival corporate giant. So Rival Corporate giant attacks, which misfires too. Remember, it is difficult to prove motivation or origin or logic in a cyber attack. Isn't it fun, boys?

Comment Assange is a spy. as simple as that.. (Score 2) 696

He'd be a traitor in Australia. To America, he is simply a foreign agent, and must be dealt as such. Or perhaps he's a "stateless" spy? Then, he is the enemy of whoever was exposed by his actions, :-). No doubt, Wikileaks exposed a lot of dirt, but the stuff was also stolen. Espionage is a necessary evil and that's how it must remain. You can't say, "hey Assange did right, but the CIA did wrong" Does the US have moral superiority? Can they say, "what assange did was right because we never do what he does"? No. I'm sure US spooks listen to 'dip' networks all the time on behalf of the US. Assange does it for kicks or for some holy cause, doesn't matter. He's a spy, nations and people supporting can only do because they benefited form him. I would support him, but I would not have anything to put up in my defence if the Special Activities Division came for me. Espionage is a fair play among nations, and that's it. Morals simply don't work in this area. Just read The Spy who came in from the cold.
The Military

Submission + - How US punishes its 'traitors' (bbc.co.uk)

it5complicated writes: Bradley Manning, the US soldier who allegedly leaked information to Wikileaks, is "being kept in a kind of punitive fashion before his trial and it is definitely weakening his mental state" according to journalist David House. Apparently Pte Manning is confined to his cell 23 hours a day, a light is kept on in his cell when he sleeps, the blankets he is given are so heavy and uncomfortable they cause carpet burns. "Mentally, he now has trouble keeping up with some topics of conversation. He has bags under his eyes and he appears to be very weak." The Marine officers deny he's being ill-treated, though.

Slashdot Top Deals

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...