"Hug a Chinese person!"

"Go out to eat in Chinatown!"

"China travel ban is racist!"

Those unbelievably-irresponsible bordering on the criminally-negligent public statements putting the public in danger and almost certainly causing unnecessary deaths did not come from the administration.

Physician, heal thyself!

Strat

There *are* more than 2 choices. One could simply carry their phone in a Faraday pouch/case and only pull it out when you want.

Well, unless the plan is to go full Orwellian dystopia and make it a crime to be without a smartphone tied to you or to prevent it from being tracked/monitored 24/7 and/or made essential to obtain basic survival and economic needs. In that case fuck that, all bets are off and those responsible at the top will get what they fucking deserve first.

Strat

If Trump is so bad then why do you want to give him and the government he runs more power over individuals' lives?

"Orange Man Bad--Give Him More Power!"

Incoherent nonsense at best, straight up insanity at worst. Especially when everyone knows at this point that Trump will get a second term and the Republicans will almost certainly become super-majorities in both houses of Congress.

Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.

Strat

Yes, of course!

You'll just be forced by law and uniformed enforcers with guns to have a tracking/ID device with your vaccination history, biometric data, and DNA code surgically implanted if you refuse and/or won't carry a smartphone. You refusal will also be penalized against your 'social credit' score, preventing you from participating in various aspects of society including travel, communications, 1A/2A rights, association with others, and commerce among others.

Ranchers don't give livestock the option to refuse.

Strat

... who come forward to provide evidence that is used to successfully convict

Yeah, let's reward greed and provide a new attack vector at the same time. I'm sure the spiteful would never attempt to frame anyone in a position of authority. Also, I'm sure these magical new agents of balance will be operating on complete information and not drawing wrong conclusions.

I think you need to re-read my post. No payoff without a conviction.

Strat

Make ratting on the corrupt in government extremely profitable.

Form a non-profit organization to solicit donations for a fund to pay huge rewards and cover the legal costs for those in government from local street cop all the way up to POTUS who come forward to provide evidence that is used to successfully convict those in government who violate civil rights and commit other crimes and violations of the law and the Constitution.

Make them fear that any of the people they must work with might expose their corruption for a fat check at any time, never knowing who they can trust or for how long with having facts and evidence about their corruption.

Greed is a thing, make it work for good.

Strat

Restricted movement is ineffective because viruses move. Goods move or your country dies. People jump borders--not just the unauthorized immigration about which Trump keeps whining, but do you think anyone wasn't desperately trying to evade the prohibition from leaving Wuhan? Everyone in Wuhan wanted out of Wuhan. Border guards contact these people and get the virus; physical barriers prohibit anyone who doesn't have the determination to go over, under, around, or through, and don't change their tactics as people compromise them.

It's not ineffective because you did it wrong; it's ineffective because it doesn't fucking work.

He IS doing three things at once: fluffing up his campaign, assaulting the WHO, and misdirecting away from his own stupidity.

Might have had better luck suing under the "due process" and "takings" clauses of the 5th Amendment.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

There was no due process performed by the State nor was the taking fairly (or even unfairly) compensated. States (and the Federal government) have successfully been sued under these clauses many times.

Strat

What if your partner isn't the person recording? Think about that the next time you decide to have "fun time" in a hotel with your special other...

Trust is usually something earned, not a fundamental right. And this is quite common in social relationships - you tend to have less trust in people you don't know that well.

+1. It seems lots of people don't know how PornHub works. Most promoted content is a) stuff they stole from other sites in the old days; b) monetized content. Adding extra controls on video uploads from non-verified accounts is atmost trivial and would have negligible impact on the actual content provided (unless your thing is upskirt videos, secret sex tapes, bathroom cams and revenge porn).

You provided no arguments for yours, and it seems you made your mind and then try to fit anything else in the narrative.

The article is about a petition; not about proposing solutions to a problem. Its on the other side (PornHub) to either refute the claims or propose feasible solutions for the presented problems.

There is no indication of malicious behaviour either; If I had to resort to create a petition because company X would ignore my legitimate complaints, I wouldn't be nice.

Don't use a bathroom you don't trust, either - even in hotels and whatnot. And use pants all the time. Hey, and don't look good or sexy - you may be featured in a "tribute" video. Because its your fault, right?