It's bullshit like that which makes the Linux biotope unsuitable for the desktop and other fields, and shows why the GPL is destructive, not useful for anything interesting, and generally not a well thought-of concept.
It shows why extremism is destructive in any field.
You may all bitch and moan about "proprietary closed shit", but at the end of the day, that very shit provides viable and accessible interfaces for people to do interesting stuff with.
"We will just use the moon as a projection surface to gather spectroscopic data from a tiny speck moving across the sun. Because we can. We're that awesome."
Men and their toys
(doesn't Google have an overt quota?)
The official Google party line is "we want the best of the best (of the best, SIR!)". As such, having a quota would be complete and utter bullshit for them, since it'd artificially bias their hiring process.
The GPL traditionally can't deal with any language "above" assembly and maybe C. As soon as a language allows "modern" features like generics or even crazy stuff like open classes, it becomes impossible to draw a clear line between projects. This effectively means that GPLed code really becomes a fast-spreading plague.
Stuff like the Asshole GPL don't really help acceptance, creating infection vectors across service boundaries.
All in all, it was fun while it lasted. Some highly encapsulated projects like the Linux kernel may stick with an old, benign version of the license, but it doesn't have a future in today's environment.
2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League