That would be $24. It costs 1.99 monthly only if you already subscribe, which means you paid $24.
How do these dickheads get away with this " $1.99 per month, billed annually," BS??

That would be $24. It costs 1.99 monthly only if you already subscribe, which means you paid $24.
How do these dickheads get away with this " $1.99 per month, billed annually," BS?.

Are you blind? You can't even read a list of 5 items properly?

Are you blind? You can't even read a list of 5 items properly?

I feel the best option is to lock your account and not give the password out for any reason to anyone including the wife. You could also install multiple browsers and prevent an autocomplete disaster. Why people share user accounts with family is impossible for me to understand. You shouldn't even share the same physical computer with anyone else. Sometimes, there are worse things than porn to discover on someones computer.

And you're being a fool. Are you saying that one is supposed to manage without a car? next time your family member is dying or in an emergency, walk, ride the bus, carpool and let us know how it turns out. Carpool will not be an option though since you'll be a social outcast and considered a leech by everyone else.

Why not? The line is not changing, the ISP would just activate the faster plan for those sites. When I lived in LA the minimum plan was 768 Kbps and the max supported in my house was 3 Mbps.

I somehow get the feeling we are missing something here." agreement that could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content's creators are willing to pay for the privilege. " Suppose I have a 768kbps connection. Maybe what google is trying to do is allow things like youtube to stream at 3Mbps, *at no extra cost to customers* but youtube will absorb the costs. I think this could very well be the case.

I wonder what true illusions are like?

Jeez, if there ever was an example of unfair moderation. My post has so many replies, and is still considered "Redundant".

3 or 4 examples don't account for the other thousands of copyright applications and works making a lot of money. Just because they posted it, doesn't mean it's true. It means that's their opinion. Try to remember how the internet works.

I don't know the Australian rationale but I wonder when Americans discuss the need for patents and copyrights. Why do content creators want to abolish patents? America is rich today because of patents and copyrights. If every second guy could rip off a great idea, we'd have nothing left to offer. We cannot compete on prices. The innovation and creativity of Americans is what has made US powerful. Why would you want to create a law that will affect your livelihood in the future? The rest of the world is just waiting for something like this to happen. I don't get it.

By the time enough Chinese and Indian Americans return to their countries, the developed world will be so far ahead that it will be impossible to catch up.

Apart from the fact that it was extremely pathetic to be watching an astronaut in a pub, I would like to say that the future is happening very slowly, much slower than I thought it would. I thought we would at least have robotic servants and flying cars by now, and not running stuff that pollutes the environment and is exhaustible.. Watching video live isn't rocket science. It was available in the 60s along with the moon landing right.