Why is it, that you must have some kind of god to believe in? How is it that the evidence supports your "to even greater certainties". You are the one that just dismisses data or studies that maybe counter to your belief system, claiming big oil is the reason for them. Prove it from any serious method and not by just quoting some tabloid story or conspiracy blog.. Hell, it wasn't until last year that science got the data on the antarctic ocean circulation was analyzed and discovered. Let alone it is one of, or the major influence on sea temp. Yet this data is not yet used in any of the models. How Dare you to presume climate science is in anyway mature yet. The arrogance is beyond belief!

Then why am I not under water by now, as where the so called 'solid' predictions of just 10 years ago said I would be? Why are only 1% of glaciers melting? and how is that significant? Why has the global temperature not risen in the last 10 years? Why hasn't new ice core data on how fast climate change has happened in the past been put into the climate models? I could go on and on, but your religion won't accept improved data because it may upset what you have already decided.

I can't believe that rossdee didn't get the joke. That is something so many tree huggers just lack the capacity to get. It worries me when basic critical thinking is required and just isn't there. This is why science is sacrificed over a blind religion. Fact is, climate science has become a religion for some. Sad.

Where is global warming when you need it? Once again I'm freezing my ass off in Canada. That ain't local weather by any stretch when it is a whole continent. Largest cold mass over the arctic in recent history once again, (notice I said "once again"!). We got lucky last year, if you can call it that. Most of the cold slipped over Russia instead of here, but not this year. The cold mass is even larger this year, so it hasn't missed us. I seriously fear a mini ice age, like in 1066, or worse. Evidence is building to support that possibility! I hope not,

David Suzuki should be jailed for fraud!! His greed has cost him his credibility. Sue me David, for calling it how I see it. What is your carbon foot print? Nice houses Dave. Nice jet-set life style. How's your buddy Gore doing? No matter what Suzuki wants others to believe, he is not a climate scientist. He (and Gore for that matter) have less credibility than a bag of stuff that smells just like sh$t, but nobody has actually looked inside yet. Pfffft...makes me puke.

I apologize to all sane people for ranting, but all these global warm...opps.. 'Climate change' conclusions done in isolation, are just not supported by the wider science as it sits now..

But do you actually get to kill the cockroach at the end of the experiment?
Would be such a waste not too. Brouhaha!!!

It may not have been a man made object.
Perhaps they may have identified it as a space rock if they knew when it hit and what angle the arrays were in at the time. I'm almost sure the power systems would have detected the change in the power caused by the impact. The arrays were built to expect impacts and remain functional, up to a certain point. It would take an awful lot to significantly effect an array.

He tweeted the apology. ;)

So on a ship you'd refer to the Captain as just a sailor?
I know this is /. So I don't expect accuracy...shrug