Probably had a phone that reported 5ge with AT&T before 5G even existed.

If spectrum allocations are at the country level in the EU, I'd think that's a major major difference than in the US wrt states.

I think 5g has all of the perks of full 4g baked in (lte and what not) and is about 20% quicker at the same frequency.

So probably indistinguishable from 4g in practical use (such that you've observed).

The mm signal is to me a fairly niche case (dense areas with lots of people outside).

Sure, but the example given.

4g service rather than 5g (and I assume same frequency, since it's pretty hard to get the high frequency 5g in the US too, and it will likely be used to supplement the terrible wired internet access rather than mobile primarily anyway) doesn't really seem like a big deal to me.

The argument seems to be that my having marginally quicker mobile internet, and can now sign up for home Internet through a cellphone provider because the wired internet situation is so bad in the US that the wireless Internet is actually a better service the EU is failing.

I'm not sure I agree that $7,200 dollars over the last 100 years (2/3 of $90/month) is better spent because now I can get fixed point wireless Internet (almost internet, it's carrier grade nat without ipv6 passthrough as an option even).

It seems to me the extra $720/year is money poorly spent and solving a problem that doesn't exist in Europe compared to the US (awful wired internet service in general).

I bet self driving trucks could get 10% more deliveries/person in dense areas.

Park at corner, walk down block dropping packages, meet truck at next corner.

Similarly with drop off driver meet at parking spot (seems more dubious though traffic flow wise).

I don't think this is where they'll do it, I assume this is better predictions of logistics with less humans analyzing, but self driving would make a significant impact on the number of drivers they need.

Yep, as long as they don't oversell it I'm happy.

I will say that during the last week of December and a recent snow day it may have been over saturated.

Just a loose feeling, and maybe it was the corporate VPN due to more people being at home.

But when I shared over teams it was taking much longer than normal for my screen to come up.

I get far better work from home performance from T-Mobile than Comcast.

The faster upstream more than makes up for the reasonable but slower downstream and the 10 extra Ms of ping

Their service is dramatically better than what Comcast offers if I care about upstream.

With T-Mobile I get 20-75 down 20-50 up.

If I want 20 up with Comcast it's 500/20 for 3x the price.

Mozilla seems to do good.

Rust seems pretty popular.

Web.asm was basically them too.

I don't is their browser anymore, but I'm happy they still exist.

The phrase "what they don't know won't hurt them" doesn't exist in English?

Interesting take.

(Without knowing the Chinese context I have to assume it has basically the same meaning).

Is it leaking data of the username and password were limited to that customer's own data?

If the software itself was single use for a business and the embedded password limited to that customers data I'm not sure?

That shouldn't be hugely disruptive /s

My only exposure to Holden is the Chevy SS that was released here in the US.

I think I'm the only person that saw it and wanted it though.

Maybe start with the fierro of that's the pitch...

Doesn't the current CAFE standard take into account height too?

Making it easier to keep one's numbers selling taller vehicles.

Also more design freedom with less crash compatibility rules?