And by well "after" you mean about 30 minutes. I never looked for injuries in the video anyway, I looked for blood, and guess what, there was none. Not only does the video show this, but the officer searching him had no problem doing so with his bare hands. That is a big no-no if blood is present.

Easy fix, teachers take attendance still, only oddities need to be investigated; ie. student wasn't absent but isn't in class, check physical log and determine if it is a defective tag.

Would you like something to drink with that strawman?

Where the fuck do you live that you don't pay taxes and everything is run by the free market. You are stupid if you think that the free market is the cure all for all that woes the world. The majority of my economics books are dedicated to why the free market fails. Stop pretending that the solution to every problem is less gov't. Less gov't got us that nice housing bubble, child labor, and the great depression.

It depends. Did he walk in for the sole purpose to spy on his roommate? If the answer is no, then no, if the answer is yes, then yes.

Equating walking in and deliberately using equipment in the room to spy on your roommate is just a terrible analogy. A more analogous analogy would be "peering through the window".

In the latter instance, the roommates privacy is being violated without him having any knowledge of the incident. In the 'walk in' scenario the roommate is aware and has been precluded to his entrance, even if just briefly.

You are right, they don't drive their cars 6 days a week on the roadways, their workers do. Their workers have also been largely educated with public funds. Their assets are protected by not only the police, but also through the judiciary. Also, their employees are able to travel cheaply across the country for business because of the FAA and the airport infrastructure in this country. Not to mention that they too benefit from the FAA and government subsidized small airports in order to fly around in their Gulfstream III. Also their businesses use the roadways and cause more damage to roads then passenger cars.

Now does the above apply equally to all rich people, no absolutely not, but to pretend that they don't benefit the most from government services is just ridiculous. Just because they don't appear to be the primary beneficiary doesn't mean that don't reap ridiculously large ancillary benefits, the most important one being a somewhat functioning society.

But keep doing business in China APPL. I am sure this isn't just a one off of things to come from that country.

Do you have any citation that proves that there is more demand for spectrum then there is spectrum. Why is this an issue only in the US, and why do we have to a) give it away or b) sell it? The rest of the world is able to do just fine with multiple carriers on a single band or two of spectrum for cell phones. Why can't the US, what makes the US this special case that has made it impossible to operate on a single band. The problem is this belief that the government can't, and hasn't done anything right ever. The fact on the other hand is the government runs well and has for a long time even though it has been slowly dismantled.

Yes, because the rest of the world doesn't operate mostly on 1 band (900 Mhz). You do realize there are standards for handling phone communications, it is called GSM, you may have heard of it.

Pick up a used 40GB Apple TV and throw Boxee onto it. Then just point it at your SMB share and let it populate. Cheap, queit, and efficient front end that looks good and comes with a remote control. Or wait and see if they can shoehorn Boxee onto the new Apple TV and then you get solid Netflix streaming to boot, or just wait until November and get the Boxee Box retail 199.

That would be a gross reduction from the %400000 you claimed there. Currently both of the major peering cases have their damages limted to $2250, or %2250 the cost of a single song.