Come on, don't be harsh, it is not his fault if he never had lunch with a Latin teacher.

How can be this steaming pile of bullshit be modded as insightful? Homework is not a way to "outsource" work to parents: _first_ you are supposed to do your homework by yourself, if you need your parents/siblings/tutors to do your homework, you are doing it wrong (and it could be a liability more than an advantage), _second_ it is a way to develop responsibility in young children, you do your own duty even if none (teacher, parents) is pointing a gun to your head to do it, _third_ there are known differences in scholastic outcome that go beyond affluence and are actually more related to cultural differences (work ethics and so on).

This stuff is now the parody of itself: "the authors of the new working paper wanted to see if homework was yet another status-reinforcing process. As it turns out, it was"... LMAO. Of course it was! If they were to investigate whether broccoli reinforce racist stereotypes, they would have found that, yes, broccoli are racists.

[citation needed]

The fact that they left the MCAS in place is not a good sign. The MCAS was an ugly patch to ameliorate the flight characteristics of the 737 and if it is still there, it means that the 737 MAX is still an ugly duckling and not a swan.

Which in a "winner takes it all" system matter really, really a lot.

Judging by most Slashdot stories of late, I'd say not at all. There has been a deluge of idiotic news about childish, political tit-for-tat, like this one.

And yet, it is true that elections in the USA are usually tainted by frauds, voter suppression, disenfranchisement, voter impersonation, "lost" postal ballots etc.

The real news here is the fact that the resistance looks more upset when Trump says the truth, then when he does idiotic things.

Yeah, this has nothing to do with the Hunter Biden's laptop affair.

He actually listed quite a lot of useful information that you could just search online by yourself: the FBI (that took the laptop), the shop owner (who said it was Hunter's laptop), the lawyers involved, the witnesses (the recipients of the emails, the business partners of the Biden's etc.), the actual photos of Hunter Biden. He was making fun of the dumbness of those who say "faake", when there are literally dozens of independent confirmations of its authenticity and of the authenticity of its contents.

So one day the narrative is Russia (!), China (!1!), Iran (!11!!1!) try to spread chaos by delivering fake news and conspiracy theories, the other day the narrative is that they are trying to suppress a story that could sow chaos more than anything they allegedly have done? Totally coherent logic.

Hush, hush, you should not mention it too. Or at least mark your message as "adult only", given the shit they found in it.
However he resigned after they refused to publish this article about Biden's businesses in China and Ukraine.

There is so much propaganda around it, that it is quite difficult not to pay attention to it. As for this bill, I am fairly sure that it will hold back economic development in Xinjiang and cause more harm to Uyghurs.

Cough... Joe Biden... cough... cough... Tara Reade...

Seriously, Weiner and Franken were held accountable only because they were indefensible, not because of some higher standard. If there were a picture of Roy Moore groping Tina Johnson, none would have defended him, like none defended Al Franken: that's it.

Now, I would not go down that road, if I were you. Bill Clinton was a registered passenger of the Lolita Express at least 26 times between 2001 and 2003 (Trump just once in 1997). There is a photograph of Chauntae Davies, one of Epstein's victims, massaging Bill Clinton when both were waiting to get back on the Lolita Express (no pictures of Trump with known Epstein's victims). Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's most famous accomplice, was an invitee at Chelsea Clinton's marriage in 2010 and allegedly met Bill in 2014, when she and Epstein were already under scrutiny. Trump cheated Epstein in 2004 and, after that date, there are not known interactions between the two. Trump met Epstein because they were both socialite from New York, but none, as far as I know, ever fully explained why the Clintons, two Arkanans, knew Epstein.

Sigh! Give me a good reason not to call you an idiot. Let me google it for you and, please, read the results before posting again.

Let me google that for you.

Not this shit again! Clinton lied and obstructed justice in a trial for sexual assault (which ended with him paying a massive sum to his accuser) and then objected that "receiving oral sex" was not a sexual intercourse to him, so the whole argument was then about a blow job: it was Clinton that made it all about the "receiving oral sex" part, i.e. the blow job, not the GOP, you fake-newser.
He was asked if he used to have/require sexual relationships with his female subordinates, he said that he never had such relationships with any subordinate of his; however many subordinates/collaborators testified that he, in fact, had or tried to have sexual relationships with them or assaulted them, so he asked for the evidence and the lawyers acquired the proof of that blowjob: at that point Clinton said that he was in good faith because "receiving oral sex" was not sex. #MeToo my ass.