I'm wondering what the wide appeal of 5G will be?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it, the 5G wavelength does NOT work and play well with walls, and would therefore mostly only be useful when outside, is this correct?
If so, since most of us tend to be sedentary and indoors in the AC (at least in the US and more and more with any western nation)...what use is the speed of 5G to us, if it can't make it to where we'd be sitting using the signal most often?
Most homes, and a lot of workplaces and stores have Wi-fi. So for a lot of the sedentary customers they don't even need data, and their phones can fall back on 4G for voice and text. Even if they do need data, if frees up congestion on the 5G spectrum for areas that the 5G will shine.
Myself I've hardly "needed" speeds faster than 3G. For 5G the benefit would be that more customers can be serviced in dense outdoor areas moreso than the speed. I've been to a couple outdoor festivals / concerts and the cell service has been shit even with temporary microcells. In the middle of a park in an area with good signal strength, but normally there would only be less than 1000 people in the area, not 50,000. In one case (13 years ago), I could only actually make a call by switching from CDMA-1x to AMPS. Two years I couldn't text, or get any data (even just to send IMs). Strangely when I made a phone call it actually connected, and when the call was active I suddenly got texts and had data (I have unlimited minutes, so I'll just make dummy calls if that's what it takes to get service). If 5G could give that kind of density minimally usable service versus no service it would be a gain, even if it isn't "ZOMG I can go through my plan's data in 2 seconds it's so fast!!!!!!!1111eleven".