This and other results bear our your thesis.

The same was true with the "Corporate" Healthcare Bill. Almost all of the Democrats had their hands out for the Corporate Millions.
And they voted predictably.

If possible the Democrats may actually be More Corrupt than the Republicans.

Internet access is not a luxury like entertainment and is more necessary than television or radio.

The FCC and some forces in the government logically wished to treat internet access as a utility but it appears that legal Corporate graft has won instead.

And this has happened where the ISP's are virtual monopolies!

Some of the new possibilities include finding your internet access restricted to a handful of sites unless you buy access to additional sites for extra fees.
Wish to access non-US or EU sites? Good luck finding a package for that!

Since ISP's are becoming liable for Copyrighted material why won't they just remove access to sites and services that people use to access material?
What percentage of the Internet will Americans even have access to?
And of course they can use bandwidth throttling to make sure only advertising comes through at high speeds. True Internet Hell!

So we need ISP alternatives! With today's technology their must be ways around the US ISP monopolies. What could a satellite dish and equipment do?
Is it feasible to setup a "Whole Internet" Coop with WiFi in an area? Or are there regulations making it illegal to bypass the monopolies?

They are just following standard business procedure in the Corporate States of America!

ISP's would always act in the best interest of their customers? Absolute rubbish.

Net neutrality is in the best interest of every customer. Breaking it and adding high costs to internet access is only in the best interests of Corporate profit.

The 3 rules of Free Enterprise:
    1. Maximize Profit
    2. Minimize Cost
    3. Follow your Corporate Charter (Optional)

The #1 mission of free enterprise is to Maximize Profits. And this is why you must pay more and more for the same service.

For a small fee!

People ought to get used to reality in the Corporate States of America! Even the Supreme Court serves the Corporations here!

The only way the public could ever have representation would be to form a powerful lobbying organization with a lot of funding.

It's purpose would be to buy politicians that agree to represent the public interest.

There would be a lot of obstacles to making a plan like this work and keep working, but the alternative sucks.

In the US we only get the crumbs the Corporations throw us out of the goodness of their hearts!

The Trouble with laws / treaties made by Big Media is exactly the same trouble as laws made by Big Corporations: perspective.

Both groups fail to see beyond their legislative goals and this results in laws that impact far more than the areas they intend.

Laws ought to be studied and debated by the public and all of the consequences understood and taken into consideration in the law or treaty.
Otherwise the collateral damage will outweigh the gains sought by the special interests involved.

Ultimately special interests and Corporations care only about their agendas and profits and not about the impact to society they have.
Only Congress should be allowed to make laws and treaties like this and only when circumstance or the people require it.

Sounds like Stephen Harper has been taking a few of those American style Corporate Millions. Sure can change you legislate eh Stephen?

Not to contradict your post, but the Government we have in this country only vaguely resembles Democracy.

The only time the people are involved in the process in a significant way is at elections, when they vote in candidates based on their image. After that almost all of the politicians take their orders from large Corporations who pay them for their services.

We saw recently that even the US Supreme Court can be bought and owned. It that is true where is our Democracy now?

I keep expecting the other shoe to drop - pay as you go internet.

It's simple, the ISP keeps track of your website access and what you do there (bandwidth, downloads, etc).
Then they bill you based on each and every site you use.

Think of all the profits!

How is it even conceivable that the government which exists at the whims of our large Corporations could choose to do otherwise than their bidding?

No mystery at all that Big Telecom got what they wanted. And it might be informative to check the officials bank accounts and other assets for signs of huge payments. After all that's how business is done in the Corporate States of America.

If this is true of almost every congressman, why wouldn't it be true of government officials?

Gentlemen, we have been sold down the river!

"Several sections of the ACTA draft show that rightsholders can obtain an injunction just by showing that infringement is 'imminent,' even if it hasn't happened yet"

This is exactly what you would expect when only one party (Big Media) has any true input into a law. It seems the rightsholders get an injunction if they make a argument that infringement might happen.

Could this injunction end up as one of the 3 strikes the poor consumers have? If so a consumer who had downloaded something before could get another "strike" without even downloading a thing. Especially since everything is handled without the Justice System being involved (railroaded).

About right for the new world of American Big Media internet. New Zealand anyone?

I've been following US politics for ~ the last 2 years and have repeatedly observed that political change now occurs when Corporate groups buy off large numbers of politicians who then do their bidding.

Any Democratic or popular reactions / movements have to counter that especially if ANY of their goals are opposed by the Corporate lobby. I suspect this could be done either of 2 ways: the movement would have to represent an overwhelming majority, threatening opponents re-elections or the movement would have to be able to out spend the Corporations in buying politicians.

Any support a movement gets otherwise would only come from the goodness of the politicians hearts!

I'm sure this will be said far better by others, but an unbiased, non-Corporatist appointment by Obama is a pipe dream!

Obama is a ardent Corporatist which you can see by his "Health Care" Bill, the bailouts and his undying advocacy for all RIAA, MPAA and Big Media causes (ACTA for one).

This Court is already a Corporatist court (Corporate Money = Free Speech ruling) and the next appointment will merely cement that.