International freedom of expression has no where near the protections that the 1st amendment offers. The first point allows others to decide what is inequality in the US. The second point is just censorship. The third is against the 1st amendment right off the bat and on top of that anytime the government (hell corps as well) tells/suggests that the media does anything it really rubs US citizens the wrong way. The forth and fifth points are like the 3rd and also completely vague.
Honestly if this laid out the rules and regs they would like to be implemented and they were very careful about stepping on freedom of expression I'd be all for it. But its current wording is just not enough and too open ended. Also in its current state you can tell this is just a reactionary not well thought out mess.