Why not work with the good folks at archive.org and their Internet wayback machine?

Is it not a similar idea?

The Internet Wayback Machine folks could use the funding and would be achieving the same purpose, albeit not in a format that the library folks might want....but they could come to agreement.

There is an update on MVP Bill Reiss's blog now.

http://www.billreiss.com/follow-up-to-webkit-for-ie-hint-i-was-wrong/

Seems like he changed his mind. He is now against the idea and has instead suggested allow Win mobile devices to be allowed to change their default browser.
Sounds like a good idea, effectively making IE, a tool used by the OS that has browsing functionality.

Effectively what he is saying is that the other browsers, can serve as browsers while IE is now reduced to a tool!

AFIK, none in production. Many lab environments but REAL 4G does not exist in Commercial Production yet.

LTE is not 4G.
LTE-A is.
IEEE 802.16m/WiMAX 2 is.

4G is standardized and will make things better but differences in Frequency usage across the planet will still cause some roaming issues.
Multi band phones will help but still...

There are still kinks to sort out with 4G..Antenna Tech among others...to get the bandwidth required to meet 4G specs.
Plus, there are no real 4G handsets out as yet either...the LTE handsets are just LTE handsets..not 4G.

Presently, many markets are using LTE just for data.
4G should and will also allow Voice over LTE...then that will be true 4G.

Till then, we stuck on 3.9G !

Agreed, AC has a valid purpose in many cases and yes to the AC who posted earlier about ACs making more useful contributions than I have, both good and BAD. I could say the same for you too. I'm not here to argue and rant off like some others. Its not a pissing contest like some would want it to be.

The intention was not so much to absolutely censor AC, but more to prevent the silly and nonsensical AC posts like First Post silliness.
The ACs are the ones who mostly post the nonsensical/offensive comments. People signed in, generally don't do so. Admittedly, registered users do post nonsense as well, but I'd venture to say less than ACs. I may be wrong.

Anonymity obviously has its benefits, like in the good example you made but it also allows people to use that to do things they normally would not do if they were recognized. I was just trying to suggest a way to reduce nonsense, although I admit that at times nonsense can be fun.

Adding Humor, Satire and intelligent wit is fine....real/proper/fun/witty Trolls.
Nonsensical "Yeah....I got first post" everytime..gets a little silly.

Of course censorship is not generally good...and yes.....I may have not thought of all the reasons AC serves when I made the post. This is /. People are waiting to pounce. ;) Thats fine. Just had good intentions. Wanted /. to be better. Good intentions are not always good enough.

There are pros and cons with everything.
There are Pros like the one you mentioned. ACs do post useful info. I'll give you that.
I guess I will just have to live with the cons of having to deal with silliness, meaningless rants.
Come to think of it...we need to laugh sometimes. ..so yeah...I may have been wrong...in the big scheme of things.
So yeah. Lets the ACs run wild. Let them say what we want. We can mod them the hell down if its crappy content.

Cue next rant/response/pounce/for/against/whatever.

Agreed.

Can we get /. to prevent the first, say 5, post replies from AC?
Let the first 5 or so posts be from registered users only. AC cannot reply to the OP until 5 or so replies to OP by registered users have been made.

5 can be tweaked...to an optimized value 3-5 i'd say.

Maybe this will stop the silly 1st post...from AC.....then again..maybe now we will egt
6th Post crap from ACs...but still better than reading a crappy 1st post.

used.
poll.
sorry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing

Used in oil and gas industry.....to create breaks in the formation down hole. To make extraction/flow of oil/gas better/easier.

I think its not just hydraulic but also using explosives...but not too sure.....or maybe they did a combination of fracking and explosives that led me to believe that they might be the same.

Fracking..can also cause breaks/fractures in areas unintended possibly allowing chemicals using in the process to seep into the water table.

Hence this pole.. IMHO.