Comment Re:Top ten lists... (Score 1) 84
But really, the facilitator(s) are your friends and family.
But really, the facilitator(s) are your friends and family.
I would argue that yes, you have the right to be offensive. However, you don't have the right to be heard. Also, being offensive just shows that you are a dick.
The way I see it, I believe something; you might believe something else. Does that make it ok for me to call you stupid and uneducated? And FFS, stop stereotyping Christians as anti-environmental, anti-technology ass-backwards inbreeds. Most of the Christians that don't care about the environment are in direct contradiction to the Bible that they supposedly hold true to (it specifically says that we are to care for the world).
Look at yourself before you go spouting off hate at "religionists" who all supposedly spend their time trying to screw atheists.
The defense?
But I worked hard on it and spent a lot of time and money copying the code.
Effort on its own means jackshit in this world (except maybe public schools), you need to actually produce something of its own merit.
In fact, they're the exact opposite of a monolithic entity.
The monolith made our monkey ancestors more intelligent. Corporations are making us more stupidity again =(
You might be confusing RL with Stargate a little bit.
You outlined a bunch of areas where bikers tend to ignore the laws of the road. Now look at all the laws that cars break: They don't stop fully at stop signs/red lights. They speed (excessively and dangerously). See any difference? I sure don't; there are dick drivers, and there are dick cyclists. Doesn't mean that you should classify all drivers/cyclists as dicks.
I can't count the number of times when I'm biking in a city, in the right lane (trying to stay out of heavy traffic and give the right of way), and someone tries to make a right turn into me. Whose fault is it then? I'm not trying to deny the fact that some people do stupid shit, just that drivers (and cyclists) see it as their RIGHT to drive how the hell they want, and anyone interfering with that can fuck off. Solution to this? Don't be a part of the problem.
In skiing, the right of way is given to the people downhill. Why? Because they can't see you coming, and you are probably going faster than they are. It is a similar reason why the responsibility is place generally on the driver, not the biker. Note: does not completely remove all responsibility from the biker. Also, look at rear-ending cases for precedent/similarities here
Also, bicycles are regarded as vehicles (in the US), which means traffic laws apply to them as well. I hate to portray the stereotypical biker attitude, but you really should "share the road." The thing is, it goes both ways.
You claim that bikers are not reasonable, nor respectful. I strongly disagree. When biking, you have a very large amount of respect for the cars/trucks that could kill you in an instant's inattention.
Lastly, regarding the shoulders, they are sometimes completely un-rideable, especially if you are using road tires instead of hybrid tires. The same reason why cars don't want to ride on shoulders (gravel, pot holes, tire fragments, roadkill, etc) are even more dangerous to a biker.
There is no other solution (aside from changing work schedule).
This is what I would recommend. Productivity drops off anyway past 8 consecutive hours of work. If the company needs 24/7 coverage, then get 3 techs per 24 hour period. You get better results from your workers, and promote a healthier work environment.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion