Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Numbers stations? (Score 2) 371

Does anyone seriously not believe the famous numbers stations as already an ultra-low-throughput form of encrypted transmission? Whether you send the data as electrical bits, RF, carrier pigeons, or a recording of Angelina Jolie saying "zero" and "one" over and over and over really has no relevance to the underlying meaning. Either it already breaks the law, or it doesn't.

Totally true. But I've never heard a numbers station in a ham band. Hams can't just operate everywhere in the shortwave spectrum. There are certain frequency "bands" they can use. The numbers stations aren't within these bands.

Comment Re:It's dead either way, why not try this? (Score 2) 371

I am not interested in supporting censorship, which is what you're doing when you pay your fees. See ya.

What "fees"? $15 for a 10 year license? It's not about censorship. It's called acting civilized, having respect towards each other, and having an environment where even kids can participate.

Comment Re:hm (Score 1) 371

Well depends on the type of encryption. I can read off a series of numbers that are a one time pad encrypted message and get the same effect. If they are talking about full on scramble and sounding like white noise (for more bw). Then yeah I could see how that could be an issue.

I don't know why your post was scored so low, because I see the point you are making, but you are wrong. Reading off a series of numbers from a one time pad IS illegal and exactly the same as a full on scramble of the signal. There's no difference whatsoever. The law is that you can't obscure the meaning of a message, and both of those examples do just that.

Comment Re:packet radio? (Score 0) 371

Yes the FCC will absoultly revoke your HAM license, if you make a habit of breaking the rules.

Get on Broadcastify.com, go to "Los Angeles county", and scroll down to the W6NUT repeater. Listen to that for a couple of days and tell me they will take your license for breaking the rules. That repeater has absolutely dripped with filth for decades, and nobody does anything about it. They SHOULD, and the FCC CAN, but they don't.

Comment Facebook (Score 1) 224

There's no promise that the owners of ANY social network won't give data over to the government when ordered to (or even simply asked to). Other than the whole issue of the government itself spying, facebook is actually as secure as you make it. Don't add apps. That will help control privacy. Also, you can control who sees EVERYTHING on your account other than the profile picture and "cover" image, which are always public. If you set everything to "friends" only, a non-friend can't even find your profile in a search, and can't see any information about you at all if they do find your page. People act like facebook is such a huge security breach sharing all aspects of your life. But facebook doesn't go through your house and workplace gathering information about you... facebook can only share what YOU put on it. If you don't post bank account information, your phone number, your vacation schedule, your address, nude pictures of your wife, whatever, then there isn't going to be much to see anyway. Even the information you DO have to enter like your birthdate, gender, etc, can all be set to private where nobody but you can see it. Use it to keep in touch with family and friends, send sensitive messages as private messages like you are supposed to and put the mundane crap on your newsfeed, and there really doesn't have to be any problems.

Comment Re:My usual path (Score 1) 413

Because of this i never migrated from Arcsoft photo editor that came with my camera to Photoshop. Moved up to The Gimp. Moved from MS Works to Open Office to Libre Office. Moved from Sound Recorder to Audacity, Ardour, and Rosegarden. Many of the Windows applications that could have cost buco bucks has been sidestepped by the alternatives.

You don't have to spend money to run programs on Windows, either... I have Gimp, Open Office, and Audacity installed on Windows 7 right now. With just about any free Linux program out there, I can find either a free windows counterpart, or find the exact program for Windows, as is the case with the above. I don't technically pay for OS upgrades, as normally I buy computers with Windows preinstalled and I usually find no reason to upgrade until I buy a new computer. Updates are free, antivirus is free (and effective), and I usually don't have to pay for any software (and that's WITHOUT pirating) for the life of the hardware. I'm not saying Linux (or any other OS) is bad, but I've just never had a need to use anything other than Windows.

Comment Re: Silverlight greatness (Score 1) 394

There's quite a bit more to it then that. How about the feature where Netflix figures out what shows I like based on what I watch (and data about what other people watching the show watch)? I have found and watched all kinds of older TV shows that I've never heard of that are really great shows. Torrent clients don't do that either.

On the other side, there's a WHOLE LOT of stuff that Netflix doesn't carry, or that they used to carry and don't anymore. Netflix is good, but there's a lot of common stuff that they don't have.

Comment Re:Obviously the cached content was not current (Score 1) 101

What's with the "f_ck" and "a_s"? If you thought the word and probably say the word, why not type the word?

Fuck and Ass. There, no one died.

That should be "F" word, "A" word, and I guess donkey is now the "D" word. Or maybe Google should be the "G" word. And for the record, no, I don't like that donkey doing that to my butt.

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...