On the contrary, science could arguably supply logical reasons to do all those things.
That would not be science with "logical reasons", that would be economics telling people to use science to do those things. Science is simply knowledge, nothing else.
"Yeah, who cares about openness. It is all about looks and prices..."
And speed and handling...don't forget those. All those are reasons I buy a particular car or not.
parent.replace("car","prostitute") for a good laugh
A person can only take more out than they put in if they collect some form of social service.
Not entirely true. EIC is in the tax-code and if you are financially poor, you will get all of your income tax back that you paid and any EIC. I was able to collect EIC when I was still in college.
The people getting shafted are the medium income earners...
I have always said that everyone has a choice, either try and be rich or just sit and be poor. Cause the middle sucks.
Yeah... i did a school speech on that in public school. Everyone else did speeches about their summer vacations or their dogs and such.
Back then i was a bit weird... now i'm mildly autistic (although my wife says i'm getting weirder as i get older).
Weird? Never let a less intelligent society attach an adjective to you.
The difference, though, is that da Vinci's notebook was filled with things he started and never completed. He loved working for the work, it would seem. Where's this in Zuckerberg's behavior?
I agree and good point, but you are assuming that he is NOT working on something else.
So, why do people worry about their online visibitlity where you can be a million different people, when everyone and their dog knows your offline person and what it is doing?
Well here in Fat-Lazy-America, people like to sit around and spy on people from the comfort of their computer. No American in their right mind would physically spy on someone, they might get into shape and live longer.
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.