Do you have a video or sound byte with context?

You aren't wrong.

  I'm willing to bet a lot of customers who aren't internet savvy will be behind plans that are going to place them behind a NAT, especially cellular wireless (super common) or satellite, and even cheaper DSL/Cable plans.

All the customers behind the NAT will have the same public facing IP address. So, the zoom log may not even be in error. They all have the same public IP address.

Yes. Committed by the Spanish, not Americans or who would become Americans.

If you are talking about Trail of Tears, etc, that blood is on the hands of the DNC.

Very sound experiment. Would hate to think what would happen when one of the toddlers would need a diaper change.

The branch intersectionalists try so hard to forget the tragedy of David Reimer.

Once he said that, you know he is a cultist and knows not of what he speaks. He is the personification of inflammatory lies on social media.

Increase that dynamic range if you want to be taken more seriously.

The particulates released also contribute to global cooling.

Burning and looting cities and attempting to burn federal court houses is terrorism. Threatening to continue this if you don't get the verdict you want is terrorism.

This is why children get an asterisk in that children cannot give consent. They cannot make choices for themselves. They cannot chose to have their balls cut off. This is why crimes against children by adults are and should have much more severe than the same crimes against an adult with agency.

Homelessness is a problem. Drug addiction is a problem. Government overreach is a problem.

Mean words on social media can be ignored.

The biggest issue is censorship period.

Once someone in power evokes censorship, they have been corrupted and unfit to lead. They should be removed from power post haste.

It is protected. You can't say it all you want. You aren't going to be canceled or jailed for saying it. That's why conversations like that happen in entertainment all the time.

Now, conspiracy to commit murder is another thing all together. If she is murdered, than that speech could be used as evidence to convict if that speech was gathered in a lawful manner. If she overheard it, she may use it to get an order of protection.

Speech is just speech. Sounds in the air, words on a page. They cannot do any harm without a person making action. It's a choice to be offended. It's a choice to be hurt emotionally. It's a choice to do illegal actions.

Words only convey ideas. What you are advocating for is for thought police. The antithesis of a free and liberal society.

We've always been at war with Eastasia.

The man posted something on his blog. That isn't inserting himself into the 'geek' news cycle.

Slashdot posted it trying to monetize woke faux outrage.

Mmm, sweet yummy clicks and outrage engagement.

But they did do better. They stayed open.