Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:More (Not in Canada) (Score 1) 145

I wonder if this is one way the RIAA/MPAA are trying to force their copyright laws onto Canada? Not allowing online streaming services like this until they adopt the US DMCA type law.
Isn't Canada on the US list of countries that doesn't have good enough copyright laws? It works both ways though. Defying Gravity is not airing in the US but is in Canada. I can't access any of the Canadian sites that are streaming the remaining episodes from the US.

Comment Re:Performance != Observance (Score 1) 145

At the absolute minimum at least in the music industry, piracy with Napster woke the industry up to the large demand for digital music. And since the digital stores like Itunes and Amazon are competing with free, I believe that has actually lowered the price. Would we still have digital options to purchase music if it weren't for the pirates? Sure but something tells me we sure as hell wouldn't be seeing songs for .50 or full new albums for $5.00. Pricing would be the same as it is now or would more closely resemble traditional CD pricing.
Do you honestly think that if CD's were still not able to be copied and the music industry had complete control over how/when/where and how much it cost to do so that digital music or CD's in general would be any cheaper? There'd probably be HD-Audio CD's that cost $30 like movies.
I'm not trying to say piracy is good and do see that in a way it is stealing. But there are many times that I feel it's completely moral/justified to pirate something. Any music I've bought before whether on CD, tape or 8 track I would have no problems downloading. Actually anything I have payed for I have no problem downloading.
Now I'm a pretty hardcore gamer and have bought in just the last 2 weeks, Uncharted 2, Brutal Legend, & Borderlands. All new release $60 games. On Nov 3'rd I'll be buying another one Dragon Age. I will be buying for the PS3 but I will be downloading it for the PC. I've also bought both of the prequel books at $15 each. Now am I a filthy thief for "stealing" the PC version? I've already payed $90 for the game and story. There are plenty of moral reasons to pirate. I've had to download games that I've purchased but ruined the disc for.
I've also downloaded software that I haven't purchased but never would of. Photoshop is a great program and fun to learn but I sure wouldn't spend $600 on it to play around on some family photos. Why photoshop? Cause I was given the Total Training instruction videos for it and like learning new things. I don't think they would've worked for GIMP all that well. I've downloaded Visual Studio to learn to program because I sure didn't have the $1200 to buy it from Microsoft and that knowledge has helped me progress in my job. Visual Basic mostly for Excel Macros in work but I only know that because I pirated the software I couldn't afford and taught myself. If I was a business making money off of either of them I would have payed. As it is I'm entirely self taught. I don't have a great high paying programmers job, but I have a decent salary and don't have overwhelming student loans to deal with.
So basically I've pirated a lot of software. But I buy a lot as well. I have over 200 CD,s over 200 DVD's. at least a dozen blu-rays. I've pirated Windows but use Ubuntu. So just how is that I'm making you pay more? Cause I have absolutely no guilt when I download something. I pay more than my fair share.

Comment Re:Performance != Observance (Score 1) 145

"Well, that's exactly what's happening. Everyone who pays for works end up paying for the people who don't. The problem is that some people aren't happy paying such high prices for the sake of pirates." Except you're wrong. If anything the prices have gone down because of pirates. You think we'd have Itunes and .99 songs on Amazon if the labels could still get away with only selling CD's for $20? The only reason we now have these cheaper digital purchase option is because of the pirates.

Comment Re:A simple comparison (Score 1) 107

Actually, at least in the US the minimum purchase on PSN is $5.00. So you buy that 4.99 game and only have a penny left over. The minimum charge is a per credit card charge, so even if you have $4 on your account and you want to buy a $5 game, you still have to add $5. Still better than XBox Live, though I do wish PSN required demos for all their games. I'll download a demo at times on XBox Live and buy the game if I like it for the PS3.

Comment Re:like Oddworld or Psychonauts (Score 1) 94

Nice little blog and I completely agree. The Wii can have good graphics it all comes down to the art style. It's never going to compete with PS3 or XBox on realistic but with some clever art design can still look great. There was a picture I saw of Bioshock a while back, Big Daddy and several little sisters, in a more cartoon/animated style. It looked great, as good as the 360 version in it's own way. And I don't imagine the Wii having any difficulties rendering a game that looked like that. If developers realized this and started to produce some decent games with stylized graphics I might have a reason to dust off my Wii again. Instead we get a bunch a mini games and the few that are targeted towards the more core gamer have been jokes. Madworld could of been good if it wasn't just arena battle after arena battle. No more Heroes had the worst aliasing I've seen since PS1 and then we get a bunch of rail shooters. Haven't played The Conduit. The only games I've liked that weren't Nintendo's were ports of PS2/Gamecube games. Okami RE4. Hell even Twilight Princess is a gamecube port. Here's the link for the anime Big Daddy http://geekadelphia.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/bioshock_anime.jpg

Comment Re:Don't be a policeman (Score 1) 286

I can definitely understand the ISP informing them that their machine is infected, shutting them off seems counter productive as the software the user needs antivirus anti-malware etc to clean up their machine will likely need to be downloaded. Not having your internet would mean a complete wipe or having to have a friend/PC shop come and clean it out for you.

Comment This seems overly complex (Score 1) 1

yes anyone posting here could likely figure it out, but I can't imagine trying to explain this to my mom for instance. Besides that a physical product(like a car) if I lend it out and my "friend" doesn't return it, I call the cops and it's theft. This seems like you're giving it to whoever you want to share with and just hope they give it back when done. Honestly doesn't seem any better than current DRM. It's still protected content. If I buy a movie like this in digital format, can I burn it to DVD for my DVD player, can I put it on my Ipod or my PS3? I don't see how the key would allow you to use the purchased content as if it was a physical product.

Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 147

PVP servers aren't just about ganking. Some of my fondest memories of WoW were taking on 2 lvl 60's with my solo level 60 rogue and coming out victorious. Or being able to assassinate 1 person (usually the mage) in a group of 5 and being able to escape the the other 4 level 60's trying to come after me. And while I did some raiding I wasn't top geared by any means. Battlegrounds I found to be extremely boring. If I wanted to have that kind of play experience I'd play a FPS.

Comment Re:Sure, but... (Score 1) 404

I don't like the idea of a camera on every corner, but do agree with one thing you said. If there is it needs to be freely available to all online and not just government/police. Cameras have a place in some public places, for instance I can see live video feeds of the major highways around here on ODOT. (OR dept of Transportation). This is a good use of placing cameras in public places.
The Almighty Buck

Submission + - RIAA Lobbying Congress For More Money (govtrack.us)

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes: "The RIAA isn't just busy with suing children, printers and dead people for piracy, they're also working hard at squeezing radio stations for more money via legislation, trying to impose performance royalties on terrestrial radio by lobbying for bills known as H.R. 848 and S. 379. You see, right now, radio stations only pay the RIAA three royalties, not four. Radio stations pay royalties for the songwriters and composers, as well as fees for music streamed over the internet, but they've always been exempt from paying performance royalties. While this would normally be just an economic dispute between the radio stations and the RIAA, thanks to the magic of government, the RIAA can get more money by lobbying Congress to require new royalties by law. So now, instead of an ordinary negotiation between two parties, we have a war between lobbyists for the two sides and Congress gets to decide who deserves the money more. While the radio industry lobbyists opposite the RIAA seem to be content with setting up a few informational websites and creating alliances to convince people that it's fair for terrestrial radio to keep their long-standing special exemption from those royalties because they uphold many public service obligations, the RIAA lobbyists have convinced the NAACP to endorse the new royalties on the theory that H.R. 848 is actually a worker's and civil rights issue. Their lobbyists managed to get a few NAACP leaders to issue a long-winded resolution defending both Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D — MI) and his bill, saying that 'H.R. 848 is a civil rights issue: Martin Luther King Jr. went to Memphis to ensure that sanitation workers got paid a fair wage. Compensating people fairly for their work is a basic civil right. We did not wage a civil rights movement to enable a few rich African American millionaires to exploit and hoodwink African-American musicians.' Naturally, radio thereby stands in marked contrast to the record labels, which have always equitably exploited artists of every race. You see, the labels stand to keep something like half of the new royalties for themselves. And it wouldn't be the first time the RIAA has gobbled up royalties meant for other people, either."

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...