Comment Re:Burden of proof? (Score 0) 88
As I recall hearing some lawyers talking about defamation, they will have to prove their allegations are true, while he has to prove they had intent to cause issues for him.
It's probably easier for his defamation claims to win, unless they actually have proof of him cheating, but if they had that, they'd have already used it to get him banned and his wins revoked.
Now to me the claims of $100 million is insane, and I can't imagine that even if he wins if he'll get a judgement anywhere near that. But again, just a reminder not only is it true that ianal, but that applies to probably everyone that's posted a comment on this thread.
The lawyers I listen to most often on youtube are LegalEagle, and Lawful Masses. So far, they haven't said anything about this case. (Legal Eagle seems more likely to cover it.)
It's probably easier for his defamation claims to win, unless they actually have proof of him cheating, but if they had that, they'd have already used it to get him banned and his wins revoked.
Now to me the claims of $100 million is insane, and I can't imagine that even if he wins if he'll get a judgement anywhere near that. But again, just a reminder not only is it true that ianal, but that applies to probably everyone that's posted a comment on this thread.
The lawyers I listen to most often on youtube are LegalEagle, and Lawful Masses. So far, they haven't said anything about this case. (Legal Eagle seems more likely to cover it.)