As a daily Mac user, I think it's safe to ask...does anyone really still use a Safari on the desktop? Doesn't everyone just use Chrome?
And why exactly would I use Chrome instead of Safari?
So it's easier for Google to track me? Besides, I hate tabs on top.
Say what you want about Apple, but they would never do shit like this.
Not true, practically every time I start chrome up pops an advert for safari, even though I have disabled every "notification" setting I can find.
I have never seen this. Do you have screenshot?
I can't believe how many think Elon is some swell guy, even after he created that rabid parasitic overlord called PayPal with his mates.
PayPal is still the only service that let's me transfer money fast and easily internationally.
So, yes, Elon is a great guy.
And the rest of your post is just as much of a lie.
What do people mean when they say "make America great again"?
I think most of those people actually mean "I want the world to revert back to how it was X years ago". With X depending on personal experiences.
Of course, that's impossible.
It's Vandenberg, not "Vandenburg"!
May I help to explain the difference?
Wood burning can be considered clean in this context because the CO2 that is released was captured from the air in the first place.
So no additional CO2 is released when burning wood.
Accessing stuff outside the sandbox becomes either complicated or completely impossible.
Complicated can mean less convenient for the user and/or more work for the developer, e.g. more expensive.
As an example, on iOS each and every app is sandboxed. That's one reason there are things which are common with desktop operating systems, but virtually impossible on iOS. Like a simple file browser - an app per default only has access to files in its own sandbox. You simply can't get at files of other apps. To mitigate that either the OS has to hand out access to individual files (like with the photo library) or files need to be copied from one sandbox to the other.
I like my headphone port, you wanna be smart? Make it 2.5mm like Blackberry tried, let's take another shot at it, see if Nokia, HTC, LG follow suit - let's switch all 3.5mm jacks to 2.5mm over the next decade? But this no headphone thing is bunk.
How is an incompatible analog port better than an incompatible digital port?
At least the digital port can be used for other things. And to use your old headphones you'd need an adapter either way.
The analog adapter would be cheaper. But that's all I can come up with.
You worry about the radiation from Bluetooth? And you call the vendors idiots?
Ad blockers happened?
One more reason to be in favour of ad blockers.
4chan board of directors: Martin Shkreli, Palmer Luckey,
... Donald J. Trump,
It's just a different spelling for the same name.
Wikipedia says his name is
The most commonly used transliteration in English is Nishimura Hiroyuki, according to the Hepburn system of romaji. It's Nisimura when written using the Nihon-shiki or Kunrei-shiki system.
(Knowledge totally stolen from https://www.italki.com/questio...)
...I believe it would be easier, and far more sensible to just ban children.
That would definitely solve a lot of problems.
Especially in the long run
Trade deficit is a net loss due to trade.
No, it's not. You got something for that money after all. Or do you call every buy a loss?
You can also source the goods and services domestically, or not import optional goods at all. Both those reduce the trade loss.
Then why don't you? The EU doesn't mandate that you do not buy from within your own country.
That's why we left.
You didn't leave yet.
Whatever happened because of the decision is just in anticipation of what is yet to come. Things will get worse.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
