Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Finally, non-compete clauses eliminated... for fast food workers (npr.org)

Beeftopia writes: Non-compete clauses are common among professionals, justified by a variety of innocuous-sounding and apparently reasonable business reasons. This story shows that, surprisingly, it is a very effective wage suppression mechanism as well, used in industries where it would seem unnecessary.

Submission + - Anti-Amazon Graffiti Increasing in Seattle (with Photos) (geekwire.com)

reifman writes: If you're eagerly awaiting your city's selection for HQ2, you may want to check out GeekWire's photo gallery of anti-Amazon graffiti images from around Seattle. Animosity towards Amazon has grown in the wake of its threats over a per head tax on employees, which the city council passed and then repealed shortly after. The tax would have increased the budget for services for our 12,000+ homeless. Amazon's CEO Jeff Bezos also fought the state income tax on the wealthy in 2010.

Submission + - Astronomers Detected a 'Ghost Particle' and Tracked It To Its Source (space.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Astronomers have traced a high-energy neutrino to its cosmic source for the first time ever, solving a century-old mystery in the process. Observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole and a host of other instruments allowed researchers to track one cosmic neutrino to a distant blazar, a huge elliptical galaxy with a fast-spinning supermassive black hole at its heart. And there's more. Cosmic neutrinos go hand in hand with cosmic rays, highly energetic charged particles that slam into our planet continuously. So, the new find pegs blazars as accelerators of at least some of the fastest-moving cosmic rays as well. Astronomers have wondered about this since cosmic rays were first discovered, way back in 1912. But they've been thwarted by the particles' charged nature, which dictates that cosmic rays get tugged this way and that by various objects as they zoom through space. Success finally came from using the straight-line journey of a fellow-traveler ghost particle.

On Sept. 22, 2017, however, IceCube picked up another cosmic neutrino. It was extremely energetic, packing about 300 teraelectron volts — nearly 50 times greater than the energy of the protons cycling through Earth's most powerful particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider. Within 1 minute of the detection, the facility sent out an automatic notification, alerting other astronomers to the find and relaying coordinates to the patch of sky that seemed to house the particle's source. The community responded: Nearly 20 telescopes on the ground and in space scoured that patch across the electromagnetic spectrum, from low-energy radio waves to high-energy gamma-rays. The combined observations traced the neutrino's origin to an already-known blazar called TXS 0506+056, which lies about 4 billion light-years from Earth. The IceCube team also went through its archival data and found more than a dozen other cosmic neutrinos that seemed to be coming from the same blazar. These additional particles were picked up by the detectors from late 2014 through early 2015.

Submission + - GMail leaking subject is for Google an intented behaviour 1

blueos writes: As you maybe know, when you read a mail on GMail, the subject of the message is stored in your history. So using google mail services on a public computer or on your own shared computer, can expose sensitive data (confirmations codes sent in message subject, ...). The technical issue is simple : the title of the webpage is set with the subject of the message you read. Web browsers (Google Chrome for example) store the title of webpages in the history.
Google was contacted about the issue, it was tagged as "Intended Behavior".

Submission + - Malware Found in Arch Linux AUR Package Repository (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Malware has been discovered in at least three Arch Linux packages available on AUR (Arch User Repository), the official Arch Linux repository of user-submitted packages. The incident happened because AUR allows anyone to take over "orphaned" repositories that have been abandoned by their original authors. So, naturally, someone took over a popular package and added a malware strain to it. The package's name is acroread, a PDF reader. Two other, yet-to-be-named packages were also infected. All malicious changes to all three packages have now been reversed, and xeactor's account has been suspended.

Submission + - PayPal Told Customer Her Death Breached Its Rules (bbc.com) 2

dryriver writes: The BBC reports: "PayPal wrote to a woman who had died of cancer saying her death had breached its rules and that it might take legal action as a consequence. The firm has since acknowledged that the letter was 'insensitive', apologised to her widower, and begun an inquiry into how it came to be sent. Lindsay Durdle died on 31 May aged 37. She had been first diagnosed with breast cancer about a year-and-a-half earlier. The disease had later spread to her lungs and brain. PayPal was informed of Mrs Durdle's death three weeks ago by her husband Howard Durdle. He provided the online payments service with copies of her death certificate, her will and his ID, as requested. He has now received a letter addressed in her name, sent to his home in Bucklebury, West Berkshire. It was headlined: 'Important: You should read this notice carefully.' It said that Mrs Durdle owed the company about £3,200 and went on to say: 'You are in breach of condition 15.4(c) of your agreement with PayPal Credit as we have received notice that you are deceased... this breach is not capable of remedy.' "

Submission + - Australian experiment wipes out over 80% of disease-carrying mosquitoes (cnn.com)

schwit1 writes: In an experiment with global implications, Australian scientists have successfully wiped out more than 80% of disease-carrying mosquitoes in trial locations across north Queensland.

The experiment, conducted by scientists from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) and James Cook University (JCU), targeted Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, which spread deadly diseases such as dengue fever and Zika.

In JCU laboratories, researchers bred almost 20 million mosquitoes, infecting males with bacteria that made them sterile. Then, last summer, they released over three million of them in three towns on the Cassowary Coast.

The sterile male mosquitoes didn't bite or spread disease, but when they mated with wild females, the resulting eggs didn't hatch, and the population crashed.

Comment Re:Sure, okay, our department doesn't exist (Score 1) 333

I really, really wonder how people who absolutely refuse to ever learn anything make it past first grade.

No, I don't have the customer tell me, via QOS bits, how to shape and police traffic. That does not mean our $100 billion network is nothing but a dumb cable.

Telling us how to shape traffic is not the customer's job.

ISP networks are not dumb cables. But their also not user data centric either. Unless of course you propose that your super-network is performing SPI on all the user data (which your not, BTW). In a best case scenario, there is port based flow going on.

    And here's a little hint. When you say the end user routers don't matter? Their NATing all that traffic you pinhead. Those are the routers that are doing the bulk of the prioritization work.

    Oh, and I SO hope you work for Comcast, if anything, to point and laugh when ISP networks go down for hours at a time.

Comment Re:Three kinds of not knowing (Score 1) 333

There is one super special kind of person who exists on the internet. This particular one who makes claims however provides absolutely no information to back up his claims. Furthermore, believes that somehow, his own positions are validated by making snide comments validates their own idiocy.

Simply put, ISP's do not, without a special contract in place, shape your traffic. They also do not provide QoS on anything without a special contract, except for THEIR OWN traffic.

https://www.ics.uci.edu/~sjord...

Provide a link to a single ISP that provides QoS service on ingress/egress of their network. Just one major provider.

Comment Re:PS, doing it wrong (Score 1) 333

Oh yea, and ding-dong? You're not going to send all your packets thru the buffer, since it's a DSP thing. Your RTP packets have already gone thru the internet, and been delivered to the buffer, flow or not, you moron. And again, we're not talking abnout how YOU treat your packets IN YOUR OWN NETWORKS, we're talking about how your ISP treats your packets.

Comment Re:PS, doing it wrong (Score 1) 333

Well now, wouldn't, based on your logic, the *carrier* be doing all this work? The entire *point* of this entire conversation is, that the public internet actively provides QoS capabilities on the internet as a whole, and that the carriers automatically perform free prioritization, and this is why VoIP can work on the internet at all.

And obviously *YOUR* router performs flow control. But your carriers DON'T, unless you pay for that feature and are specifically routing between your own endpoints. Do you REALLY think that your home networks are doing active flow control? That Comcast Business connections are respecting your QoS bits on packets ingressing into their network? Your being idiotic. COMCAST DOES NOT SUPPORT QOS OF ANY SORT. As a matter of fact, MOST ISP'S DON'T. And their ALSO not performing flow analysis of your traffic. By all means, show me a single shred of evidence that a top 10 ISP utilizes ANY of the points your talking about.

And if your employer is paying you 3 million a year, their obviously not getting their moneys worth, assuming, we are talking about the general internet here. And point to point tunnels do NOT count here, because THAT'S where the money is to provide that capability, and THAT'S not the internet.

Comment Re:Your guess is wrong. Reasonable, but very, very (Score 1) 333

Well, you should REALLY tell the rest of the internet that paying extra to ISPs to have them resepect QoS on ingress/egress routes is wasting their money I suppose. I mean, WHY exactly would people pay SO much extra money for such a thing, right?

As for 'your local router', I challenge you to take a cheapo netgear, and a Ubiquity EdgeRouter, connect it to an xfinity gigabit connection, and go ahead and tell me that your local router doesn't matter.

Oh, and for those small companies who are installing Cisco gear, might as well tell them their all wasting their money, since the router can't matter much, might as well just toss some cheap linksys's at them.

Oh yea, and the #1 method used to reduce the jitter is the use of the playout delay buffer in the case of Cisco gear. Might want to give them a call and let them know, total waste of time, and you can handle all their jitter problems. I'm sure they would LOVE to hear from you.

Comment Re:Couldn't be further from the truth, thousands o (Score 1) 333

Yes, however, everything about managing the jittering of VoIP is based on the local and remote routers. The internet backbones themselves aren't doing what your talking about. While everything you've said is true, the special handling is NOT occurring outside of your own routers. Raw bandwidth is.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...