Comment Re:Lesson plans on e-waste, don't trust this repor (Score 1) 236
Hi Anonymous. You bring up some good points. I don't think anyone has all the answers here. The questions that remain are important. Yes, please share your Nairobi report showing 80-90% re-use. How did the report define "re-use" in 2006? Where are those devices now six years later? What data would we have If tracking devices were put on a random sample of those re-used units in 2006?
I read the GreenBiz URL regarding Peru. Peru can only track imported equipment that is reported. A lot of imported tech stuff is not reported. Greenbiz cites an article quote "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates roughly 400,000 tons of e-waste goes to recyclers every year, and that up to 80 percent of the materials sorted for recycling end up in operations in China, India, Southeast Asia and West Africa where it is disassembled and burned or dumped."
BAN and the EPA estimate that a majority of working and broken electronics sent to Africa and China are disposed of in ways that harm the environment. There is very little documentation to show that Africa and China have safe facilities to capture the toxins. Electronics arrive new and used, working and not.
I read the GreenBiz URL regarding Peru. Peru can only track imported equipment that is reported. A lot of imported tech stuff is not reported. Greenbiz cites an article quote "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates roughly 400,000 tons of e-waste goes to recyclers every year, and that up to 80 percent of the materials sorted for recycling end up in operations in China, India, Southeast Asia and West Africa where it is disassembled and burned or dumped."
BAN and the EPA estimate that a majority of working and broken electronics sent to Africa and China are disposed of in ways that harm the environment. There is very little documentation to show that Africa and China have safe facilities to capture the toxins. Electronics arrive new and used, working and not.