Go to Mars. Most of us would agree that there are much more beneficial endeavors, probably more profitable as well. But the fact of the matter is nothing else would get as much attention from the general public as going to Mars.

First off, a weekly build is asking a lot. So much in fact, that it would hinder development. If every week the development team was just trying to produce another working demo, no features would be completed. I worked on a program in college over an entire semester to control a model train set. We spent 130+ hours per team member on the project, and didn't have a working demo until 3 weeks before the end of the semester. If we were required to have a working demo within a week, we would've never been able to work out other features (stopping collisions, allowing the train to reverse, change switches, sound a horn, etc.)

Most builds of the current game status would be unplayable. You wouldn't be able to do much other than look over the code.

As for requesting changes, you would have to invest much more than just the price of the final game before you could be taken seriously. If it were me, I would listen to the guy who paid me $1,000 rather than the person who paid $50 and expects a free copy of the game when it's completed.

Just like the earth isn't round and the sun isn't the center of the solar system, right?

Certain ideas may seem ridiculous, until you take the time to really look at them objectively.

I remember laughing watching my friends and sister play Super Mario for NES for the first time. Every time they wanted to jump, they'd press A and pull up on the entire controller. Like they were trying to use motion controls when they weren't even part of the game! I understand that buttons will never go away, but motion controls can provide some nice additions to gaming.

I swear that Mario jumped farther when you flailed about madly when he was in the air. (at least my 5-year old mind thought so) When I first played Super Paper Mario for the Wii, and you used motion controls to combo hits on enemies, I laughed out loud. I remembered my first experience with Mario and how it had all come full circle.

It's not that motion controls are better, that isn't my argument. They're just much more intuitive.

Um, check your math. You'd owe $60. It'd be 60 cents for each movie.

I understand that they're named after some famous scientists, but how are these names any better or more notable than Colbert? It's not like I'm going to remember Sir William Herschel and Max Planck any better because they have a spacecraft named after them. I had to look both up cause I didn't know who they were.