Of course, Vista and 7 tried to be a $500 way of running Windows apps, while XP was a $100 way of running Windows apps. And compared to XP, Vista also needed $400 worth of hardware.
Depressing proof that it's all in the marketing.
Vista cost me $100 the week it came out - legally at that. You're either doing it wrong or you're being disingenuous for the sake of argument.
You should work for free, society deserves to leech off you...
Oh do fuck off you anonymous twat.
What's the problem? We were planning on thanking you in the release notes...
Released last November along with the Mac OS X client, it has failed to share the expected continual growth as seen with Mac client
Because you failed to read the sentence correctly.
What gives Microsoft the right to change the way the Windows platform handles media content?
That it's their software that they've created? That they're allowed to do with it as they see fit, because it's theirs and they own it? How dare they change their new OS so that it differs from the old one, you know?
"More software projects have gone awry for lack of calendar time than for all other causes combined." -- Fred Brooks, Jr., _The Mythical Man Month_
