Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Follow the money (Score 1, Insightful) 549

If Antifa and BLM had just stayed home and not gone to Charlotte, then KKK and Nazis would have had their rally, looked like fools, and then gone home.

Everyone would see what fools they are. The press would make a single mention o the rally and that would be it. No one would care what they said or think.

But nooo. They had to go in and start some shit. Now, they are the opposite side of the coin. Anyone who wanted to justify the KKK and Nazis just had to point to Antifa and BLM.

Good job guys.

yes, let's just let the KKK and Nazis go unchallenged that'll show them.

Comment Re:Cool that someone still stands for freedom (Score 3, Insightful) 549

Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me.

Talking about nazism and racism, even promoting such views is free speech. It's not an assault on anyone, it's only words. If someone is promoting such views then at least you know where they stand and can decide wether to have dealings with them or not. Which is better than them holding such views in secret. Would you want to do business with someone who secretly hates you and thinks you have no right to live? I certainly wouldn't. I would choose to take my business elsewhere if i knew someone to be a nazi or hold any other such extremist views.

Anti-nazi speech should similarly be protected, and people should be just as free to tell nazis (and any other groups) exactly what they think of them.

Speech should be protected, draw the line at actual physical violence.

come back at me the next time you've had someone call you a "chink" and tell you to "go back home" when you already are.

better yet, come back at me when you can explain why Heather Heyer had to *die*

Comment Re:Cool that someone still stands for freedom (Score 0) 549

Anyone who defends Free Speech these days is called a Nazi and Racist and their words are called "violent".

Make no mistake, your protestations are not about human decency, they are about a creeping authoritarianism from the left that would allow only approved speech. Guess who the people approving it would be...ya...

i'm a fan of freedom of speech. FOR ALL. nazis and racists actively work to deny the freedom of speech of people of color. if you actually believe in freedom of speech, there is NO ROOM for racists who silence folks of color through violence and intimidation. it's the paradox of tolerance.

Comment Re:Cool that someone still stands for freedom (Score -1, Troll) 549

Cool that someone still stands for freedom of speech.

Most people were brainwashed to think that freedom of speech means "freedom to say anything - as long this are the 'good things'".

Naziism and racism is not "speech" - it's an assault on human beings and should be stopped.

Comment Re:Problematic as a precedent (Score 3, Insightful) 396

They're stopping people from providing funds for a lawyer. Perhaps you'll understand some day. Ass-hole.

no they're not. explain to me how supporters are blocked from sending this guy checks or cash. or sending whoever the attorney is checks or cash. answer: they're not.

also explain to me why GoFundMe et al should be forced to facilitate the funding of a murderer? answer: why the fuck should they be?

Comment Re:I hope he sues... (Score 1) 711

So the first line has two references in it, and you say "backed by nothing". The last line again contains a reference. Discuss the references, don't pretend he's basing it on nothing.

The extraversion part has no references, true. But this is not a research paper - it is an internal memo that is more full of citations than I've ever seen in a memo. If you worked at Google, it would be totally reasonable to ask where the hell he got that part from (though to be honest I found it right away Googling for it).

And if the Google climate can't handle the debunking of a young man's memo, then it is all he is accusing it of being. He didn't drink the Kool-Aid.

one of the references is a sociology paper that does not back his conclusion, and the other references are cites to Wikipedia. give me a break.

you still don't get it. this rant called women "neurotic" and "anxious". that by itself created a hostile work environment towards women. Google was forced to act, and they were right in firing him.

Comment Re:I hope he sues... (Score 1) 711

he outright asserted, based on no proof or bad science, that women have "more anxiety" and are somehow biologically not suited to be engineers.

Congratulations, you revealed yourself to have not read the paper. Citation please.

you're kidding, right? all of page four. bald, sexist assertions. no citations to, well, anything. here, i'll help:

Personality differences

Women, on average, have more:

  • Openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas. Women generally also have a stronger interest in people rather than things, relative to men (also interpreted as empathizing vs. systemizing).
    • These two differences in part explain why women relatively prefer jobs in social or artistic areas. More men may like coding because it requires systemizing and even within SWEs, comparatively more women work on front end, which deals with both people and aesthetics.
  • Extraversion expressed as gregariousness rather than assertiveness. Also, higher agreeableness.
    • This leads to women generally having a harder time negotiating salary, asking for raises, speaking up, and leading. Note that these are just average differences and there’s overlap between men and women, but this is seen solely as a women’s issue. This leads to exclusory programs like Stretch and swaths of men without support.
  • Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance).
    • This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs.

all of this is pseudoscientific bs backed by nothing.

what woman would be willing to work with such a toolbox?

Any woman willing to discuss facts and science.

of which this "memo" is sorely lacking.

Comment Re:I hope he sues... (Score 1) 711

Google was foolish to fire him.

Yes, despite his memo's rather awkward inclusion of female vs. male traits, it was actually a memo about Google's intolerant culture - and they did a wonderful job of proving his point for him.

except the whole sections on "male" vs. "female" traits are WHY Google fired him. he outright asserted, based on no proof or bad science, that women have "more anxiety" and are somehow biologically not suited to be engineers.

he created a hostile work environment with this one part alone. of COURSE Google has to fire him. what woman would be willing to work with such a toolbox?

Comment Re:Does this predict ruling? (Score 1) 572

Federal law states people cannot be denied entry to the United States purely on the basis of their nationality.

precisely stated, what the Immigration and Nationality Act states is: "Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 101(a)(27), 201(b)(2)(A)(i), and 203, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence."

"Paragraph 2" talks about the per-country quotas. 101(a)(27) is for "Special Immigrants" (think unaccompanied minor refugees). 201(b)(2)(A)(i) sets aside visas immediately for spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizens (if parents, the U.S. citizen has to be 21 or older - anchor babies are a myth). 203 outlines preference categories for family members and employment-based cases.

so, for at least persons seeking immigrant visas (looking to live in the U.S. permanently), Congress has said that the government cannot discriminate against immigrants on the basis of race, nationality, and/or place of birth, except under the sections specifically broken out.

Trump's problem is that he publicly stated the ban is against "muslims" and against persons of specific nationalities or places of birth. he is on record both pre-campaign and during presidency.

the INA DOES permit the government to bar persons who will cause harm to the U.S. from entering. but that is an entirely different issue than what the Trump admin is doing here.

Comment Re:Tech employee here (Score 3, Informative) 329

Conscription was never an element.

So what happens if not enough people want to be doctors? Wait times grow arbitrarily. (This is also a problem in the US for some specialties, but it illustrates my point).

You need a system for rationing the available care-providing resources. You need a system for deciding how much to fund care and research. A market-based system couples these, giving an optimal answer. The current US system is the worst of both worlds, because health insurance is procured by companies, not by consumers. No market signal, and some people aren't covered. The only worse idea is the O-care exchanges.

the market is terrible for this. it results in gougers like Martin Shkreli. or the deplorables running EpiPen. capitalism demands making an immediate profit in the short term with no care for the long term - the absolute opposite of what health care should be about.

Comment Re:It ISN"T a real, primary job people... (Score 1) 64

the problem is that economic conditions are now forcing people to MAKE this their full time job. and severe cuts to healthcare and the general safety net are tightening the screws, not to mention the steamroller of automation coming down the pike. 1099 work might have been fine at one point, but it is NOW becoming a capitalists' wet dream and a regular worker's worst nightmare.

Your lack of the ability to form coherent sentence that use proper grammar and punctuation will serve you well in the "Gig Economy."

this is a troll. you have two glaring grammar errors in your own sentence. 3/10, go practice on Reddit or something.

Comment Re:It ISN"T a real, primary job people... (Score 5, Insightful) 64

To do this on a full time basis, you have to be and adult, now how to budget, put money aside for periods between contracts (sometimes you may want to take a month off)....

But please...lets keep in mind, all these people are adults, and they can and should make their own decision and live with the consequences of such.

the problem is that economic conditions are now forcing people to MAKE this their full time job. and severe cuts to healthcare and the general safety net are tightening the screws, not to mention the steamroller of automation coming down the pike. 1099 work might have been fine at one point, but it is NOW becoming a capitalists' wet dream and a regular worker's worst nightmare.

Submission + - Malvertising Campaign Finds a Way Around Ad Blockers (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader writes: What many have feared has become reality today, after Malwarebytes researchers have discovered an online malvertising campaign that can bypass ad blockers. Named RoughTed, this campaign has been going strong for over a year, and has been delivering malicious ads on sites such as Adf.ly, ExtraTorrent, Openloud, and many others in the Alexa top 500.

In an interview, Jerome Segura, the researcher who discovered this campaign says RoughTed uses very aggressive advertising to detect a user's PC details. Segura also says that RoughTed is not the first malvertising campaign to deploy ad-blocker bypassing scripts, but it's the first at such a large scale. Users of ad-blockers have also started noticing RoughTed's ability to bypass their extensions.[Adblock Plus,uBlock originor AdGuard]

Furthermore, RoughTed seems to be very diverse, sending users to all sort of nasty sites, such as exploit kits, Windows PUP download sites, Mac adware sites, iOS pay-per-install schemes, online surveys, tech support scams, rogue Chrome extensions, and others. Basically, this malvertising campaign takes advantage of most of its traffic, not just users that use old IE versions.

Comment Re:A Community Without Trolls (Score 1) 200

How do you define 'racist' or 'mysogynist'? Because from what I've seen, that slope is so incredibly slippery, it pretty much covers everyone who doesn't agree with your opinions. Even if facts and commonly accepted definitions speak against you, e.g. you create an active discrimination based on race or gender. Suddenly pro-equality people are called racists or mysogynists, simply because they don't agree matriarchy is the way, that whites should be vilified and discriminated against, or that they think 'cishet scum' is a slur.

The typical exchange is:

"X" "You -ist scum, how dare you say X?" "Since when is X no longer acceptable?" "-ism was never acceptable, you bigoted nazi shit!" "But until very recently X wasn't -ism." "La la la can't hear you nazi asshole!"

it's not slippery at all. the crux of the problem is that white folks don't understand what racism is and refuse to listen when it's pointed out. this isn't a disagreement, it's white people refusing to listen. you even insert the exact strawman of people "attacking" folks who are pro-equality. it is still entirely possible for someone who believes in racial equality to do racist things.

the mere fact that my first post got modded as a troll is evidence of this: the naive libertarian element on Slashdot is unwilling even to lend an ear, to be empathetic and sympathetic for once. that is the point: LISTEN. shut up and LISTEN.

maybe instead of barreling on like a bull in a china shop, stop, listen, then respond.

and very likely, as soon as you or anyone else sees this post, they will immediately respond with a load of "b-b-b-b-b-b-but #NotAllWhites!" or similar. THAT'S NOT THE POINT. pause before you respond. consider what people are saying FIRST before typing or speaking. that's literally it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...