It's actually really sad... Google has built an innovative platform for distributed computing, that solves quite a few problems, vastly superior to the state of the art in distributed computing, but they basically keep the filesystem and clustering implementations completely to themselves, it would seem.
And here I thought they were a publicly traded company trying to make money...
And for aesthetic reasons, they need to be placed in fairly remote locations away from urban centers, which reduces efficiency.
Wrong. There are new designs besides the standard windmill type that can be placed atop tall building and skyscrapers. I saw them on the Green Channel where it looks more like a DNA structure that spins. It also protects against throwing ice and such off of it and is actually more efficient in the types of wind that cities receive (which whip around in different directions). Your argument just doesn't add up. Plus if you add enough wind and solar then you do create a baseline. There is always some wind and some sun somewhere.
Man, I hear you. I had a girl sending me half-nude pics of her, and talk dirty via ICQ, because she deliberately wanted to get my dick hard. And then when she succeeded, my boss came in, and asked me to stand up and come with him.
Where do you work that your boss wants you to COME with him? A porn studio?
The link is really light on the math. In most systems that obey similar behavior, demand does increase, but the increase in demand does not completely erase the benefit of the increase in efficiency. In this case it can't completely erase the benefit, because if it did the end result would be a net increase in the price - and that was the original basis for the argument, that the drop in price would spur consumption. So the increase in demand has to fall short of that point.
I agree. Also, their math is implying that by 2016 we will be driving 30% more miles. I find that rather hard to believe, especially with exurb and suburban sprawl slowing down in the housing recession.
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker