Gotta tie it into global warming somehow.
This particular issue has nothing to do with it, and is at a faster rate.
Wrong. It is not the cause of Global Warming, and it is not caused by Global Warming. So far you would be right. But it is a problem whose consequences get worse due to Global Warming. So yes, it has to do with Global Warming.
An 18-wheeler was overkill.
Everyone knows that they should have used a station wagon.
In fact, the Atlas Centaur which carried Mariner 6 and 7 to Mars, weighted 136 metric tons while carrying just 400 kg of payload. At this ratio, we would need more than 300 times the payload, hence a rocket able to carry an ICBM to Mars would weigh between 6000 and 12000 metric tons or four times Saturn V.
I don't think that the point of writing assignments is to produce documents as a product. It's to have the student go through the process of gathering, analyzing and understanding the material, in order for them to learn it. If they skip that work, they learn little or nothing.
In the real world, being effective in directing a computer to produce a bunch of text that you know nothing about is not a worthwhile skill. If someone comes back with issues related to the AI-generated content, how would you address the problems if you're mostly ignorant about the topic at hand?
And yes, our car has 110 HP (81 kW). It has a top speed of 120 mph. It gets up to 60 mpg. I don't see any reason to call this one under-powered or garbage. We are driving about 25,000 miles per year with the car, and there never has been a situation where I felt that there was a serious lack of power. It even has a towing hitch and is licensed for pulling up to 3400 lbs.
So why don't you feel that way about the first and second amendments?
They don’t need them: they’re the redcoats!
Or did I misunderstood you completely?
And there I was thinking that the free exchange of thoughts and ideas implies that you can freely state your thoughts and ideas? Those are mine. And my thinking is that to pinpoint a (geologically or historically) short term trend, it is sufficient to look at a short time period. I don't know how the climate on Earth will be in one million years, and my interest into the weather forecast for the year 10002024 is mainly academic. But I am very interested in the next 30 years, because that's what I expect to experience myself, and I am quite interested in the climate in 2100, because that's what my children maybe, and my grandchildren hopefully will experience. And for that, looking back 30 or 80 years, is very intriguing, while the climate at the time Homo neanderthalensis appeared for the first time is less interesting.
HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!