Absolutely! The same can be said for Linux users. They are always honest, straightforward, fair, and never act in a hypocritical fashion. That includes all of the companies that make contributions to the kernel itself. Squeaky clean and wholesome, the lot of them.

The only thing you have going for you is that you married a chick with firebush. She's obviously a stupid bitch if she married you, but she might be fun on a Friday night.

Typical Linux zealot and his McCarthy Style bullshit. I long for something new.

Twitter is going to shit bricks.

There is indeed a difference, but the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem suggests this difference is as irrelevant as your comment.

From the blog/fourm:

Great! A version of MAME released in 9 years ago this month.

And a lot of them aren't very stable or fast, no matter what OS is used to host the ATM software application being used on the machine. The problem? Often it's the client software. Who gets the blame? The Microsoft OS. From who? Microsoft haters and immature Linux zealots.

I call bullshit. We didn't even get to see the demonstration itself. It's entirely possible that the no OS could prevent the style of intrusion that was going to be demonstrated. But, you get get extra Microsoft bashing points just for pointing out the host OS used, whether or not it was part of the problem.

Yeah, no shit? Gee, so was mine. But the parent was suggesting that a majority of people, which excludes the likes of you and me, had their first computer experience using a PC. Just another self-centered prick, always wanting to stick his dick in the equation.

Well, the Linux community has finally met their match!

Slashdot has always been a day late and a dollar short.

Read it again, jealous dumb-fuck. No where did he say "Unix Sucks" or make any other negative comment about the system, except to say that it benefits from not being the most widely used system.

Good old Glyn. No doubt a favorite of Kdawson and many Slashdot folk. This is the same guy that idolized Stallman by using an analogy of a man who passes out a never ending supply of bread and then claimed ignorance when I showed this was a rip off of Jesus Feeding the multitude. A real class act to be sure.

I asserted, as I do here, that zealots like Glyn who treat Foss as if it were a religion are a problem that is not discussed often enough, and is the reason articles like this should be viewed with a skeptical eye that is careful to notice the true motivations of the author.

That was the default, but since Vista that has no longer been the case. It's also incorrect to assume that users won't elevate privileges on any system to install software they think is legitimate or useful to them.

Good job. The word "Twitter" should have been a sign to look for trouble. You've been here how long?