Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Has to be better than my other stock picks. (Score 1) 288

I don't think AMD has ever been a good investment. They are the little energizer bunny from hell to keep Intel execs awake at night, they're one of the best things to ever happen to technological progress, but the flipside is that their financials are always somewhere between "underperforming" and "imminent bankruptcy". It's pretty amazing actually. If every company was driven the way AMD was driven, humanity would be a lot farther along by now and, well, let's just say wealth distribution would be a bit different on this planet.

Comment *facepalm* (Score 3, Insightful) 393

There are at this time about a bazillion comments here pointing out that a privilege escalation that requires root access is not a privilege escalation.

I don't know what the authors of those comments were doing for the past 5 years, because they should really consider whether they are qualified to talk on the subject. AMD and Intel have been incorporating virtualization and paravirtualization support into their CPUs for a long time, and there is a massive market for these solutions. For an equal amount of time security researchers have been messing around finding exploits like this one in the hardware. Privilege escalation from domain to hypervisor/cross-domain level is a breach of the virtualization security model, and you can bet your ass it's a serious security issue. And if your favorite virtualization solution doesn't consider this a root exploit, then that solution is broken. Because there's no way anyone in their right mind running something like 50 domains on some 24-core beast - made specifically to virtualize the crap out of everything - will consider those domains being able to get root in all other domains to be anything short of a huge problem.

tl;dr: root is not root if you are in a guest domain. (cue inane Matrix reference to taste)

Comment Re:Still... (Score 0) 859

Wrong. CFLs will never overcome their disadvantages, because they contain a poisonous chemical (mercury) and will be replaced by LED lighting at first opportunity. The people denouncing CFLs have a very valid point - CFLs produce mercury contamination in a less controlled manner than power plants do. LED lights however have no such disadvantages and are in every relevant sense superior to all other forms of lighting we have.

Comment Re:External Tank (Score 1) 422

Where exactly do you think the tank goes after MECO?

The shuttle doesn't have a lot of maneuvering authority after MECO. To stay in space, it fires the OMS to circularize its orbit. The main tank has almost exactly the same orbit until that point, but doesn't circularize it, so it falls back down into the atmosphere. At the apogee, it's very much in space, though.

Comment Re:Not exactly looking good in the MP arena. (Score 1) 234

The funny thing about UT3 is that everyone agrees that it failed to live up to UT2004's awesomeness, but nobody can agree on the reasons for it.

Beyond the excellent onslaught mode and all the good stuff it succeeded in carrying over from UT, there was something ephemeral to UT2004's success. A lot of people say that UT3's fault is that it was developed for the PS3. I'm not sure how true that is. But UT2004 was a reboot of UT2003; maybe the Titan Pack can serve as the same kind of reboot for UT3, maybe not. I hope it will, or that Epic will make something unreal again to return it to popularity, because the Unreal series rocks.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...