Comment Re:Just a thought (Score 0) 466
Step 1: "Lose" prototype
Step 2: Create mystery around 2 similar but decidedly different scenarios
Step 3: ???
Step 4: PROFIT!!!
In Soviet Russia the toys eat you
Sorry, this doesn't make sense if you decompile the meme because we do not eat the toys in the first place. "We eat toys/In soviet russia toys eat you?"
I believe a better use would be "In Soviet Russia, Happy meal eats you"
...Leads past that point are likely to be interpreted as an attempt at misdirection...
Maybe. But did you ever stop and think that maybe the said hacker is actively giving the phisher another avenue of misdirection?
If the phisher becomes aware that he is actively being probed for information, what's stopping him from reversing the hack to get the hacker busted (perhaps anonymously) to create a diversion? Not saying it happenes everyday or that phishers are usually that smart, but it's definately plausible
What's with all these Daffy Lawsuits?
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker