Comment Minimum age (Score 1) 59
Looks like 13 is the minimum age to be on the platform, so someone gave her an account without the necessary guidance:
Looks like 13 is the minimum age to be on the platform, so someone gave her an account without the necessary guidance:
Wireless "security" cameras are basically a prop. They can be hacked or jammed without ever being in their field of vision before they become inoperable.
Or at the very least to have onboard storage, so they still keep a visual record even when the network connection gets lost. PoE based cameras, with a UPS are probably still the best way to go?
The government, can't afford to allow businesses to too large or too powerful. You can just look at the banana republics to see what happens when a private business gets too powerful. It isn't good for the government and it is isn't good for the inhabitants of the country.
Businesses will naturally want to take every short cut or hack available to them, unless there is a law preventing them doing so. This is no different to how players are subjected to rules in a sports game. We could expect the market players to be ethical and respectful, but history shows that they'll screw anyone over to get make money, whether it it employees or customers (when they get too big), along with the long term future of the company.
It is hard to have a fair negotiation when the other party either holds you over a barrel or is able to take advantages of "cheats" not available to you as a smaller entity.
Simply leave. They will cave in.
But Brexit... everyone will bow to us and treat us with respect.
The other thing they’ll need to regulate is the appearance of a vape. You can now buy vapes that look like eye liners or pens, for example. This makes it harder for teachers to enforce in school.
The market is very poorly regulated so God only knows what you're actually breathing in.
You're really behind the times on this. Towards the end of the year, the FDA released a list of all the vape products which have been authorized for sale in the US. Pay no attention to the fact they're all subsidiaries of "big tobacco", no underhanded crony capitalism going on there.
So, while the regulation is certainly in place, what is presently happening is like that famous line from Star Wars - the FDA lacks the resources to prevent all the vapes which are coming in from China. As we know, China isn't overly concerned with the health and well being of Americans, they're doing that whole Ferengi-like profits-come-first thing that they learned from watching us.
Will probably need to compare that list to whatever the EU lists. It’s generally felt the EU is both stricter and a number of years ahead, when it comes to deciding what not fit for humans.
Personally, I think vaping will increase life expectancy. Nicotine is an appetite suppressant, so fewer obesity-related deaths. And it seems to delay the onset of dementia.
Yeah, but do they have to be single use?
Have you seen the amount of used vapes lying around the floor these days?
(yeah, we know, you pick them up for the LiPo betteries inside...)
The other crazy thing, is one person I spoke to said they were cheaper than the refills and tasted better than the refills. If this is really the case, then WTF!?
This really makes me want to understand the economics and profit margins on each.
A good idea, and not exactly controversial IMHO. Go do it
Yup and one of their better ideas, especially amongst the huge range of bullshit TLDs they’ve allowed to be created in the last few years.
There's already a widely used domain for this purpose: home.arpa
https://datatracker.ietf.org/d...
Why reinvent the wheel? Just because ".internal" is easier to remember?
The
Would it not be worth borrowing from diabetes and simply adjusting the naming to include a type categorisation? For example "Cancer Type 1" or "Cancer Type 2". They would be still considered cancers, but from a medical and communication perspective at least it would help people put things in the right perspective.
Is this a case of the software company announcing loudly there is an issue and that suing someone is better than fixing it? Did they fix it?
No way. Plex has been around for a very long time as this type of software goes. It would have happened already. And it's not Plex's fault that the retarded streaming companies all want their own ever-shrinking piece of the pie, driving people back to piracy. Not sure how they'd ever pressure Plex, short of a buy-out.
You used to be able to access content on your local network, without needing an online presence and then they changed that. For that reason, I wouldn't put anything beyond them.
So now they seem to go for "it's all a subcontractors fault"? I wonder what the next excuse is.
On the Spirit factory floor, some machinists building planes say their concerns about quality rarely get conveyed to more senior managers, and that quality inspectors fear retaliation if they point out too many problems.
If quality problems actually exist on the subcontractors floor, then I'd say it's pretty damn obvious who you should be blaming.
Spirit shouldn't have reduced it's QA standards. Plain and simple. Don't give a shit who's applying the pressure to do so otherwise either. Your reputation is either worth something, or it isn't.
In the end is doesn't matter if it is Spirit's fault, it ends up being Boeing's fault, since they are meant to have final oversight over their contractors. Boeing should at least have periodic spot checks of parts coming from a subcontractor.
Right now Boeing has been failing at QA in both the air and space sectors, so this sounds more like a cultural issues stemming from the top?
Proper backups is exactly what should be done, but there are quite a few businesses out there which are held hostage by someone who waves the hands about âoesecurityâ and then complains that there is reason x y z why it they arenâ(TM)t taking the necessary actions. This even when someone is willing to work with them to resolve the issues.
Did a bit more hunting and found the following article:
https://www.travelcodex.com/wh...
The relevant paragraph states:
Airlines can order an aircraft with whatever number of seats that can legally fit in that aircraft. It is for this reason that the door plug exists on the Boeing 737 MAX 9. Most 737 MAX 9 aircraft have less than 190 seats so the standard four exit doors and four overwing exits will satisfy the emergency egress requirement. RyanAir orders their Boeing 737 aircraft with high-density seating where there are 199 seats or more. On the RyanAir aircraft, the plug door is an actual full-functioning exit door. All airlines flying the MAX 9, have opted for the less-expensive door plug instead of a full-functioning exit door because these aircraft have less than 190 seats. It is interesting to note that the airline that has the functioning exit door, RyanAir does not fly the 737MAX 9. They currently fly a high-density seating 737 MAX 8-200 with 199 seats. This unique MAX 8 aircraft does have full-functioning doors at row 28.
With all the fancy scientists in the world, why can't they just once build a nuclear balm?