Unless Reddit explicitly stated that it was a platform for free speech, then I guess it has some sort of (moral) obligation to stand by that. Has Reddit ever said anything like that?

I sure hope so otherwise you'd be the worst stalker ever.

I don't give a rat's ass about the socio-economic status of the people affected.

I do care about net neutrality.

The idea that penalising certain data sources is harmful to a free internet seems well accepted. The fact that our retarded legislators couldn't figure out what so many were shouting at them is the real problem. There is no goddamn difference between penalising source A and "helping" every source *except* A. These zero-ratings is the exact thing we said would happen. It's penalising the companies that do not pay for "premium" services.

"Therefore, balancing calories in to Calories out is not so stupidly simple as it seems to the underweight layperson "

Using my impressive array of mental superpowers, I predict that fatties will use this as an excuse for not exercising.

"Slashdot"

Using my impressive powers again, I predict hilarious fat jokes will be forthcoming in this very thread.

Had I wanted someone else to administrate my computer I would have installed WIndows 10.

Yes, that's why all the good books are 140 characters or less.

Ha, that's two for one.

Yes, I'd say it's a re-occurring "coincidence" that the accomplished and successful ones never place the blame on "everyone-but-me" (or, in this day and age, "the-patriarchy-wherein-all-collaborate-in-secret-to-keep-me-down-because-I'm-a-special-snowflake"). Maybe it's because they were taught to "get up, dust yourself off, and try again" instead of "cry a lot, get an adult to do it for you". Whatever the reason, it's obvious that there is no pandemic of inequity. Perhaps one should instead look to things like merit, attitude, and performance?

That's also funny, because 'merit' is nowadays considered hate-speech by certain people (and the 'meritocracy' rug was removed from Reddit HQ as it was considered "triggering" and "excluding" by the same type of certain people).

Maybe I'm jaded because I've been raised by people that never blamed "everyone-but-me" for their own failures, or because in my workplace everyone lives and breathes "get up and try again (or get your grants pulled and be fired)". Regardless, it seems that the ones competent enough to 'do' are managing just fine without placing the responsibility of their own well-being onto everyone else.

She founded it herself, and it's stacked only with other professional victims. Her "gainful employment" consists of begging for money on Twitter.

It kinda does since a developer is a job position, and a job requires that you 'do' stuff. Thus, Randi might qualify as a professional victim, or a beggar, but not as someone that actually develops.

He argues that reality applies to all of us. You seem to disagree. This reminds me of a recent South Park episode on safe spaces.

HAHAHAHAHHA.
Seriously? Come on, no one actually believes that. Not even Wu herself.

The "critics" that reviewed her game wanted to signal what side of the debate they were on. The reviews were more about Wu than the game.
Heh, now that I look for it on Steam, it seems to have been pulled. Maybe it was too "good" for Steam, eh?

No, this is basic SJW stuff.

"I cannot dispute your argument, so I'll pretend it doesn't exist and try ad hominems instead."

It's not so much trolling as just funny and/or sad.

Twitter is labelling dissenting opinion as trolling if Twitter prefers one side of the argument.

Heh, I've used all of those except 'amazing' in almost every paper I've written (and the few times I missed an opportunity, someone else suggested I add them in). It really is important to note that your stuff is super-mega-new (novel/innovative/unprecedented/modern/current/concomitant to something else that is new) and that it does something radical.

Some even show this 'radical'ness by using completely irrelevant measurements for their comparisons with established mainstream algorithms/procedures. It's pretty fucking low, but they do get published, and getting published means your chances of research grants increase...

I have never used 'amazing' though. My mother taught me that describing myself or my work with 'amazing' may come off as mildly narcissistic.