Your reasoning seems to be flawed. Google supports FOSS community, yes, but not exclusively - many of their products are still non-FOSS, for example. So how they can be "traitors" is beyond me.
And, by the way, this kind of rhetoric and loaded word usage is precisely what turns many people away from FOSS advocates.
Well, they are supposed to be open standards supporting. They commonly say "we support ". So yes, I would say that using a codec that free software cannot ethically use would be betraying the community that they make use of every day. They use our software to make money, and this is the best possible way they could give back.
I apologize, that was supposed to say "They commonly say "we support (insert open standard/free software product here)." And just an addendum, if we didn't use "loaded word usage" we would simply be ignored. Just because you think it is fine that the millions of FOSS users could not use YouTube/wikipedia(if they didn't make this stand), doesn't mean we agree.
Your reasoning seems to be flawed. Google supports FOSS community, yes, but not exclusively - many of their products are still non-FOSS, for example. So how they can be "traitors" is beyond me.
And, by the way, this kind of rhetoric and loaded word usage is precisely what turns many people away from FOSS advocates.
Well, they are supposed to be open standards supporting. They commonly say "we support ". So yes, I would say that using a codec that free software cannot ethically use would be betraying the community that they make use of every day. They use our software to make money, and this is the best possible way they could give back.
Heh, well i just hit the little link and then hit the link at the top to go back to the main topic... then sent a e-mail to
Yeah, messed up there... meant to put "little comments link"
Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.