Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Internet can't be free according to Italian judges (corriere.it) 1

An anonymous reader writes: "There can't be a boundless prairie where all is allowed and nothing can be forbidden" according to the Italian judge who convicted Google senior officials for a video showing harassment against a disabled person, once appeared on Google Video. This could be read today in the official motivation of the sentence (article in Italian. Here the pretty bad Google Translate version, choose otherwise your favorite translator). In a blatant attempt to intimidate freedom of speech against preventive control (a practice very much common in Italy until not long ago) this sentence goes down hard against the very concept of freedom and "frontier" America stands for. The judge also cites how "privacy conditions" are not "clear enough" in the long legal blab of Google. How impolite. Luckily enough, the legal system in Italy is based on civil law, so a decision from a judge can't be seen as a new law like in America. Google is said to have appealed to that sentence.

Comment Re:where did they get their numbers from? (Score 1) 116

I'm brand new to the international internet "scene", yet I understood. I'd never seen anybody use periods as thousands separators(yeah, I'm from America), but I managed to get what he was saying pretty easily. That being said, it would be nice to use -something- different for the decimal point or for the thousands separator, so that it's not the same.

Comment Re:Open codec or google is a traitor (Score 1) 428

Your reasoning seems to be flawed. Google supports FOSS community, yes, but not exclusively - many of their products are still non-FOSS, for example. So how they can be "traitors" is beyond me.

And, by the way, this kind of rhetoric and loaded word usage is precisely what turns many people away from FOSS advocates.

Well, they are supposed to be open standards supporting. They commonly say "we support ". So yes, I would say that using a codec that free software cannot ethically use would be betraying the community that they make use of every day. They use our software to make money, and this is the best possible way they could give back.

I apologize, that was supposed to say "They commonly say "we support (insert open standard/free software product here)." And just an addendum, if we didn't use "loaded word usage" we would simply be ignored. Just because you think it is fine that the millions of FOSS users could not use YouTube/wikipedia(if they didn't make this stand), doesn't mean we agree.

Comment Re:Open codec or google is a traitor (Score 1) 428

Your reasoning seems to be flawed. Google supports FOSS community, yes, but not exclusively - many of their products are still non-FOSS, for example. So how they can be "traitors" is beyond me.

And, by the way, this kind of rhetoric and loaded word usage is precisely what turns many people away from FOSS advocates.

Well, they are supposed to be open standards supporting. They commonly say "we support ". So yes, I would say that using a codec that free software cannot ethically use would be betraying the community that they make use of every day. They use our software to make money, and this is the best possible way they could give back.

Comment Underestimating your enemy (Score 1) 410

Even if this did work in theory, someone would think of a way around it. We'll never be completely safe from malware, no matter what security mechanisms are in place. It's like in physical security, security system companies come up with new locks, and thieves come up with new lock breakers. Unless we brainwash the entire population of the world to be nice and not try to break systems, there will never be a conclusive way to detect malware. Oh, and wouldn't his method for detecting malware be horribly intrusive?

Slashdot Top Deals

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...