Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment I love Linux (Score 1) 1880

I would love to use Linux. Every time I install it I really like it an find it a massive improvement on Windows. I first started using it over a decade ago and it has come a long way in that time. Unfortunately, there are still very annoying things about it. I lead a very busy life which is dependant on my computer being reliable. Over the past few years Ubuntu and other distributions have got to the stage where you can use it normally and do just about everything you would like to do on Windows (bar high end gaming and certain applications like Photoshop) with ease. However, every single time the distribution has tried to upgrade itself, it has borked. I'm not kidding: every single time! Sometimes something silly and fairly easy to fix like the new entry in the boot loader not pointing towards the correct new kernel. Sometimes it is something a lot more difficult. At the moment I have an install just upgraded to Ubuntu 11.10 that lost all visual because of some clash between the new kernel and the current graphics drivers (and I don't have a crazy weird card). It is unacceptable. I realise this is not everyone's experience and I am unlucky, however I refuse to believe the success rate is at all acceptable. So every time this happens I find myself grudgingly going to back to my "faithful" Windows install.

Comment Re:Bill o'Reilly (Score 1) 203

Exactly! Science has failed and this clearly means it is all false. What we need is clear thinkers like Bill who haven't muddied their head with fancy science degrees!

Incidentally, I believe it is clear this is an artificial star created by a cosmological super-race.

Comment Re:Unlikely (Score 2) 272

Well, it has been going on the ages, but I think that it is fair to say it has blown up now. The issue had been swept under the carpet by the police and government until recently. The Guardian have been telling the Met, the Government and the PCC for years that they have all of this information, and if it wasn't investigated properly they would run the stories. Eventually they called time. I don't think it is necessarily the change of public mood that has caused it to explode in such a manner. I think it is implications of criminal activity perpetrated by so many powerful people in Government and the Met. They have had to all come out and start blaming each other for it, as opposed to leaving it in the long grass where they wanted it. The public reaction hasn't actually been that great, it was a massive media and Westminster reaction though. In some ways you could still call it a storm in a teacup.

Comment Re:Cloud (Score 1) 44

Err, this is just not true. Any public sector jobs have far stricter rules regarding the procurement of employees compared to private sector. If people try anything like what you have suggested, then they would be risking the sack. Not saying it doesn't happen a bit, but in my experience many businesses are hampered by family and other personal allegiance a lot more frequently.

Comment Re:Not a failure (Score 1) 132

It's not a failure if you're in the business of government. When you're spending other people's money, it hardly matters whether you "succeed" or "fail". What matters is that the money passes through your hands, giving you a chance to exploit that cash flow for personal gain. At the top of the pyramid, ANY expansion of cash flow is desirable, no matter what the consequences. Your time in power won't last forever, and you've got to move if you want to exploit it. This domain-seizure program pales in comparison to the death, destruction, and injustice caused by drug prohibition, but the goal is essentially the same: justification for spending, borrowing, and generally expanding the business of government.

You're not in the business of government, are you?

[Citation Needed]

Slashdot Top Deals

Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.

Working...