Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:MAGA Bomber!!! (Score 2) 247

What exactly is "everything Dems stand for"?

I'll field this one. I'm independent but have only voted for Democratic candidates simply because no one happened to be better.

The first priority is to institute a check against the lunacy coming out of the White House. This is absolutely essential because Donald Trump doesn't think, he just spouts whatever happens to pop into his deranged brain at the moment, and because he's president, it suddenly becomes policy. Cruel, real life things, like separating children from their families and restricting rights for women and minorities. Perhaps we can curb his use of stochastic terrorism that leads to incidents like the one we are discussing.

Once that is accomplished, maybe we can focus more on policies that help people instead of actively hurting them. Healthcare for all would be a good start. Certainly that would benefit more people than some inane wall.

Comment Re:False positives? (Score 1) 210

They're saying that they have to destroy photo-sharing of children to save it.

Have they really destroyed photosharing of children on FaceBook? Cause I'm still seeing more pictures of the satan spawn of family and "friends" than I care to. And so what if FaceBook gets it wrong once in a while. How compelled do you really feel about sharing your innocent photos of little Johnny discovering himself in the bathtub? Is that the only photo you have of him or would another one suffice?

Comment Re:Waiting for Dave's rant on this (Score 2) 359

People need a lot less oil than they need water.

That's true. I don't *need* any oil, but I like to keep some in my car at all times.

Transporting water by pipe quickly becomes infeasible.

Most every building I've ever been in has water piped in. So, it's somewhat feasible.

Comment Re:Why would they say this? (Score 4, Insightful) 102

This is the Justice Department. They're all about using every law on the books to make their targets sweat (cf. Swartz, Aaron). Why would they ever state publicly that they can't do something?

They could have said nothing and everyone would assume if caught hacking voting machines they would be prosecuted. Here they are publicly stating there's no law against it and you can't be prosecuted. Go ahead and hack away. There's no downside to it. Sounds more like tacit permission if not downright encouragement to me.

Comment Re: Seriously, America. (Score 5, Informative) 1293

Are you delusional or what ? I live in Europe and I can walk safely anywhere without fearing to be shot by some random asshat.

I live in the United States and also walk safely anywhere without fear of getting shot. Been walking around for fifty-something years and never seen anyone pull out a gun in public.

I can see how it might appear that we are all armed to the teeth and taking potshots at each other if all you have to go by are the news stories. Personally I don't own a gun simply because I don't want or need one and I'm certainly not fearful. Fearsome, one might argue, but that's another story.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...